首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Evaluation of Chikungunya Diagnostic Assays: Differences in Sensitivity of Serology Assays in Two Independent Outbreaks
【2h】

Evaluation of Chikungunya Diagnostic Assays: Differences in Sensitivity of Serology Assays in Two Independent Outbreaks

机译:基孔肯雅病诊断分析的评估:两次独立暴发中血清学检测灵敏度的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe sensitivity and specificity of two in-house MAC-ELISA assays were tested and compared with the performance of commercially-available CTK lateral flow rapid test and EUROIMMUN IFA assays for the detection of anti-Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) IgM. Each MAC-ELISA assay used a whole virus-based antigen derived from genetically distinct CHIKV strains involved in two chikungunya disease outbreaks in Singapore (2008); a January outbreak strain with alanine at amino acid residue 226 of the E1 glycoprotein (CHIKV-A226) and a May-to-September outbreak strain that possessed valine at the same residue (CHIKV-226V). We report differences in IgM detection efficacy of different assays between the two outbreaks. The sensitivities of two PCR protocols were also tested.
机译:背景技术测试了两种内部MAC-ELISA分析的敏感性和特异性,并与市售CTK侧向快速检测法和EUROIMMUN IFA分析法检测抗基孔肯雅病毒(CHIKV)IgM的性能进行了比较。每种MAC-ELISA分析都使用了一种基于病毒的完整抗原,该抗原源自与新加坡在两次基孔肯雅病暴发中涉及的基因不同的CHIKV毒株(2008年)。一月份的爆发菌株在E1糖蛋白的氨基酸残基226上带有丙氨酸(CHIKV-A226),五月至九月的爆发菌株在同一残基上具有缬氨酸(CHIKV-226V)。我们报告了两次爆发之间不同检测方法在IgM检测功效方面的差异。还测试了两种PCR方案的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号