首页> 外文期刊>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Evaluation of Chikungunya Diagnostic Assays: Differences in Sensitivity of Serology Assays in Two Independent Outbreaks
【24h】

Evaluation of Chikungunya Diagnostic Assays: Differences in Sensitivity of Serology Assays in Two Independent Outbreaks

机译:基孔肯雅病诊断分析的评估:两次独立暴发中血清学检测灵敏度的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The sensitivity and specificity of two in-house MAC-ELISA assays were tested and compared with the performance of commercially-available CTK lateral flow rapid test and EUROIMMUN IFA assays for the detection of anti-Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) IgM. Each MAC-ELISA assay used a whole virus-based antigen derived from genetically distinct CHIKV strains involved in two chikungunya disease outbreaks in Singapore (2008); a January outbreak strain with alanine at amino acid residue 226 of the E1 glycoprotein (CHIKV-A226) and a May-to-September outbreak strain that possessed valine at the same residue (CHIKV-226V). We report differences in IgM detection efficacy of different assays between the two outbreaks. The sensitivities of two PCR protocols were also tested.
机译:背景技术测试了两种内部MAC-ELISA分析的灵敏度和特异性,并将其与商用CTK侧向快速检测法和EUROIMMUN IFA分析法检测抗基孔肯雅病毒(CHIKV)IgM的性能进行了比较。每种MAC-ELISA分析都使用了一种基于病毒的完整抗原,该抗原源自与新加坡在两次基孔肯雅病暴发中涉及的基因不同的CHIKV毒株(2008年)。一月份的爆发菌株在E1糖蛋白的氨基酸残基226上带有丙氨酸(CHIKV-A226),五月至九月的爆发菌株在同一残基上具有缬氨酸(CHIKV-226V)。我们报告了两次爆发之间不同检测方法在IgM检测功效方面的差异。还测试了两种PCR方案的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号