首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Peritoneal Dialysis International : Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis >The Effects of Biocompatible Compared with Standard Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Peritonitis Microbiology Treatment and Outcomes: the balANZ Trial
【2h】

The Effects of Biocompatible Compared with Standard Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Peritonitis Microbiology Treatment and Outcomes: the balANZ Trial

机译:与标准腹膜透析液相比生物相容性对腹膜炎微生物学治疗和结果的影响:balANZ试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

♦ Background: A multicenter, multi-country randomized controlled trial (the balANZ study) recently reported that peritonitis rates significantly improved with the use of neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions low in glucose degradation products (“biocompatible”) compared with standard solutions. The present paper reports a secondary outcome analysis of the balANZ trial with respect to peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes.♦ Methods: Adult incident PD patients with residual renal function were randomized to receive either biocompatible or conventional (control) PD solutions for 2 years.♦ Results: The safety population analysis for peritonitis included 91 patients in each group. The unadjusted geometric mean peritonitis rates in those groups were 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.41] episodes per patient-year for the biocompatible group and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.62) episodes per patient-year for the control group [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.90; p = 0.01]. When specific causative organisms were examined, the rates of culture-negative, gram-positive, gram-negative, and polymicrobial peritonitis episodes were not significantly different between the biocompatible and control groups, although the biocompatible group did experience a significantly lower rate of non-pseudomonal gram-negative peritonitis (IRR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Initial empiric antibiotic regimens were comparable between the groups. Biocompatible fluid use did not significantly reduce the risk of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.34), but did result in a shorter median duration of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (6 days vs 11 days, p = 0.05). Peritonitis severity was more likely to be rated as mild in the biocompatible group (37% vs 10%, p = 0.001). Overall peritonitis-associated technique failures and peritonitis-related deaths were comparable in the two groups.♦ Conclusions: Biocompatible PD fluid use was associated with a broad reduction in gram-positive, gram-negative, and culture-negative peritonitis that reached statistical significance for non-pseudomonal gram-negative organisms. Peritonitis hospitalization duration was shorter, and peritonitis severity was more commonly rated as mild in patients receiving biocompatible PD fluids, although other peritonitis outcomes were comparable between the groups.
机译:♦背景:一项多中心,多国家的随机对照试验(balANZ研究)最近报道,与标准品相比,使用低葡萄糖降解产物(“生物相容性”)的中性pH腹膜透析(PD)溶液可显着改善腹膜炎发生率。解决方案。本文报道balANZ试验在腹膜炎的微生物学,治疗和预后方面的次要结果分析。♦方法:将具有残余肾功能的成人事件PD患者随机分配为接受生物相容性或常规(对照)PD解决方案2年。♦结果:腹膜炎的安全性人群分析每组包括91例患者。这些组中,未经调整的几何平均腹膜炎发生率对于生物相容性组为每患者年0.30 [95%置信区间(CI):0.22至0.41]发作,对于每个患者年为0.49(95%CI:0.39至0.62)发作。对照组[发病率比(IRR):0.61; 95%CI:0.41至0.90; p = 0.01]。当检查特定的致病菌时,尽管在生物相容性组和对照组之间,培养阴性,革兰氏阳性,革兰氏阴性和多菌性腹膜炎发作的发生率没有显着差异,尽管生物相容性组确实发生了显着降低的非致癌率。假性革兰氏阴性腹膜炎(IRR:0.41; 95%CI:0.18至0.92; p = 0.03)。两组之间的初始经验性抗生素治疗方案相当。生物相容性液体的使用并没有显着降低腹膜炎相关住院的风险(调整比值比:0.80; 95%CI:0.48至1.34),但确实缩短了腹膜炎相关住院的中位时间(6天vs 11天, p = 0.05)。在生物相容性组中,腹膜炎的严重程度更有可能被定为轻度(37%vs 10%,p = 0.001)。两组患者的整体腹膜炎相关技术失败和腹膜炎相关死亡的风险相当。♦结论:生物相容性PD液的使用与革兰氏阳性,革兰氏阴性和培养阴性腹膜炎的广泛减少相关,对非假性革兰氏阴性菌。接受生物相容性PD液的患者,腹膜炎的住院时间较短,腹膜炎的严重程度通常被定为轻度,尽管两组之间的其他腹膜炎结局相当。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号