首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >Effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during prone position
【2h】

Effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during prone position

机译:俯卧位期间压力控制和体积控制通气对呼吸力学和系统应力反应的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundProne position during general anesthesia for special surgical operations may be related with increased airway pressure, decreased pulmonary and thoracic compliance that may be explained by restriction of chest expansion and compression of abdomen. The optimum ventilation mode for anesthetized patients on prone position was not described and studies comparing volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) during prone position are limited. We hypothesized that PCV instead of VCV during prone position could achieve lower airway pressures and reduce the systemic stress response. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of PCV and VCV modes during prone position on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation, and hemodynamics, as well as blood cortisol and insulin levels, which has not been investigated before.
机译:背景特殊外科手术在全身麻醉过程中的位置可能与气道压力升高,肺和胸腔顺应性降低有关,这可能是由于胸部扩张和腹部受压所致。没有描述俯卧位麻醉患者的最佳通气模式,并且在俯卧位期间比较容积控制通气(VCV)和压力控制通气(PCV)的研究有限。我们假设俯卧位时PCV代替VCV可以降低气道压力并降低全身性压力反应。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较俯卧位期间PCV和VCV模式对呼吸力学,氧合和血流动力学以及血液皮质醇和胰岛素水平的影响,这之前尚未进行过研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号