首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Endovascular Therapy >Edoxaban Plus Aspirin vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results of the ePAD Trial
【2h】

Edoxaban Plus Aspirin vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results of the ePAD Trial

机译:Edoxaban加阿司匹林与双重抗血小板治疗在外周动脉疾病患者的血管内治疗中的作用:ePAD试验结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: To report a randomized study that investigated the safety (risk of major bleeds) and potential efficacy of edoxaban, an oral anticoagulant that targets the major components of arterial thrombi, to prevent loss of patency following endovascular treatment (EVT). >Methods: Between February 2012 and June 2014, 203 patients who underwent femoropopliteal EVT were randomized to receive aspirin plus edoxaban or aspirin plus clopidogrel for 3 months in the Edoxaban in Peripheral Arterial Disease (ePAD) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier ). Randomization assigned 101 patients (mean age 68.0±10.4 years; 67 men) to the edoxaban group and 102 patients (mean age 66.7±8.6 years; 78 men) to the clopidogrel group. The primary safety endpoint was bleeding as classified by the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) criteria and ISTH (International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis) criteria; the efficacy endpoint was the rate of restenosis/reocclusion. >Results: There were no major or life-threatening bleeding events in the edoxaban group, while there were 2 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events in the clopidogrel group by the TIMI criteria. By the ISTH classification, there was 1 major and 1 life-threatening bleeding event vs 5 major and 2 life-threatening bleeding events, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 1.70]. The bleeding risk was not statistically different with either treatment when assessed by TIMI or ISTH. Following 6 months of observation, there was a lower incidence of restenosis/reocclusion with edoxaban compared with clopidogrel (30.9% vs 34.7%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34, p=0.643). >Conclusion: These results suggest that patients who have undergone EVT have similar risks for major and life-threatening bleeding events with edoxaban and aspirin compared with clopidogrel and aspirin. The incidence of restenosis/reocclusion events, while not statistically different, was lower with edoxaban and aspirin, but an adequately sized trial will be needed to confirm these findings.
机译:>目的:报告一项随机研究,该研究调查了以抗动脉血栓主要成分为目标的口服抗凝剂edoxaban的安全性(重大出血风险)和潜在功效,以防止血管内治疗后通畅性丧失(EVT)。 >方法:在2012年2月至2014年6月期间,对203例接受股pop静脉EVT的患者进行了随机分组,以接受阿司匹林加edoxaban或阿司匹林加氯吡格雷治疗,进行了为期3个月的埃德沙班外周血疾病(ePAD)研究(临床试验。政府机构识别码)。随机将伊多沙班组101例患者(平均年龄68.0±10.4岁; 67名男性)和氯吡格雷组102例患者(平均年龄66.7±8.6岁; 78名男性)。主要安全终点是根据TIMI(心肌梗塞溶栓)标准和ISTH(国际血栓形成和止血协会)标准分类的出血;功效终点为再狭窄/再闭塞率。 >结果:根据TIMI标准,依多沙班组无重大或危及生命的出血事件,而氯吡格雷组无2项重大或危及生命的出血事件。根据ISTH分类,分别有1个重大和1个危及生命的出血事件与5个重大和2个危及生命的出血事件[相对风险(RR)0.20,95%置信区间(CI)0.02至1.70]。通过TIMI或ISTH评估时,两种治疗方法的出血风险在统计学上均无差异。经过6个月的观察,与氯吡格雷相比,依多沙班的再狭窄/再闭塞发生率较低(30.9%比34.7%; RR 0.89,95%CI 0.59至1.34,p = 0.643)。 >结论:这些结果表明,与氯吡格雷和阿司匹林相比,接受过EVT的患者使用edoxaban和阿司匹林的重大出血事件和危及生命的事件具有相似的风险。再狭窄/再闭塞事件的发生率虽然没有统计学差异,但依多沙班和阿司匹林的发生率较低,但仍需要进行足够规模的试验以证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号