首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Development and Pilot Testing of a Multiple Mini-Interview for Admission to a Pharmacy Degree Program
【2h】

Development and Pilot Testing of a Multiple Mini-Interview for Admission to a Pharmacy Degree Program

机译:多次迷你面试的开发和试点以攻读药学学位课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives. To develop and pilot test a multiple mini-interview (MMI) to select students for admission to a pharmacy degree program.>Methods. A nominal group process was used to identify 8 important nonacademic attributes of pharmacists, with relative importance determined by means of a paired-comparison survey of pharmacy stakeholders (ie, university-affiliated individuals with a vested interest in the quality of student admitted to the pharmacy program, such as faculty members, students, admissions staff members, and practitioners). A 10-station MMI based on the weighted-attribute blueprint was pilot tested with 30 incoming pharmacy students. MMI score reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and correlation with other admissions tool scores were determined.>Results. Station scores provided by student interviewers were slightly higher than those of faculty member or practitioner interviewers. While most interviewers judged a 6-minute interview as “just right” and an 8-minute interview “a bit long,” candidates had the opposite opinion. Station scenarios had face validity for candidates and interviewers. The ICC for the MMI was 0.77 and correlations with prepharmacy average (PPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) composite were negligible.>Conclusions. MMI feasibility was confirmed, based on the finding that interview scores were reliable and that this admissions tool measures different attributes than do the PCAT and PPA.
机译:>目标。开发并试行多次迷你面试(MMI)以选择要攻读药学学位课程的学生。>方法。使用名义小组流程来确定药剂师的8个重要的非学术属性,其相对重要性是通过对药房利益相关者(即对加入药房课程的学生的质量有既得利益的大学附属个人,例如教职员工, ,招生人员和从业人员)。基于加权属性蓝图的10个站点的MMI已与30名即将进入药房的学生进行了先导测试。确定了MMI评分的信度(类内相关系数[ICC])以及与其他录取工具评分的相关性。>结果。学生访调员提供的站位得分略高于教师或从业人员访调员。虽然大多数访调员认为6分钟的采访是“正确”,8分钟的采访是“有点长”,但候选人却持相反的观点。驻地方案对候选人和面试官来说是有效的。 MMI的ICC为0.77,与药房平均水平(PPA)和药学院招生考试(PCAT)的相关性可以忽略不计。>结论。基于访谈得分可靠的发现,证实了MMI的可行性。并且该准入工具所衡量的属性不同于PCAT和PPA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号