首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Pain Research >Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain due to soft tissue injury: diclofenac epolamine topical patch
【2h】

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain due to soft tissue injury: diclofenac epolamine topical patch

机译:局部非甾体类抗炎药用于治疗软组织损伤引起的疼痛:双氯芬酸依波明局部贴剂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this article is to review published clinical data on diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% (DETP) in the treatment of acute soft tissue injuries, such as strains, sprains, and contusions. Review of published literature on topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac, and DETP in patients with acute soft tissue injuries was included. Relevant literature was identified on MEDLINE using the search terms topical NSAIDs, diclofenac, diclofenac epolamine, acute pain, sports injury, soft tissue injury, strain, sprain, and contusion, and from citations in retrieved articles covering the years 1978–2008. Review of published, randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses shows that topical NSAIDs are significantly more effective than placebo in relieving acute pain; the pooled average relative benefit was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.5–1.9). In a limited number of comparisons, topical and oral NSAIDs provided comparable pain relief, but the use of topical agents produced lower plasma drug concentrations and fewer systemic adverse events (AEs). The physical–chemical properties of diclofenac epolamine make it well suited for topical use. In patients with acute soft tissue injuries treated with DETP, clinical data report an analgesic benefit within hours of the first application, and significant pain relief relative to placebo within 3 days. Moreover, DETP displayed tolerability comparable with placebo; the most common AEs were pruritus and other application site reactions. Review of published literature suggests that DETP is generally safe and well tolerated, clinically efficacious, and a rational treatment option for patients experiencing acute pain associated with strains, sprains, and contusions, and other localized painful conditions.
机译:本文的目的是回顾有关双氯芬酸依洛明局部贴剂1.3%(DETP)在治疗急性软组织损伤(如劳损,扭伤和挫伤)中已发表的临床数据。包括对急性软组织损伤患者的局部非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs),双氯芬酸和DETP的已发表文献的综述。在MEDLINE上,使用主题为NSAIDs,双氯芬酸,双氯芬酸epolamine,急性疼痛,运动损伤,软组织损伤,劳损,扭伤和挫伤的检索词以及从1978-2008年检索到的文章的引文中找到了相关文献。对已发表的随机临床试验和荟萃分析的回顾表明,局部用非甾体抗炎药在缓解急性疼痛方面比安慰剂有效得多。合并平均相对收益为1.7(95%置信区间1.5-1.9)。在有限的比较中,局部和口服NSAID可以缓解疼痛,但是局部使用药物可以降低血浆药物浓度,减少全身不良事件(AE)。双氯芬酸依波明的物理化学特性使其非常适合局部使用。在接受DETP治疗的急性软组织损伤患者中,临床数据报告首次使用后数小时内有止痛效果,相对于安慰剂,在3天内可明显缓解疼痛。此外,DETP的耐受性可与安慰剂媲美。最常见的不良事件是瘙痒和其他应用部位反应。对已发表文献的回顾表明,对于因劳损,扭伤和挫伤以及其他局部疼痛而引起的急性疼痛的患者,DETP通常是安全且耐受性良好,临床有效且合理的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号