首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >A review of Grey and academic literature of evaluation guidance relevant to public health interventions
【2h】

A review of Grey and academic literature of evaluation guidance relevant to public health interventions

机译:灰色和有关公共卫生干预措施的评估指南的学术文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPublic Health evaluation is essential to understanding what does and does not work, and robust demonstration of effectiveness may be crucial to securing future funding. Despite this, programs are often implemented with poor, incomplete or no evaluation. Public health practitioners are frequently required to provide evidence for the effectiveness of their services; thus, there is a growing need for evaluation guidance on how to evaluate public health programs. The aim of this study is to identify accessible high-quality, evaluation guidance, available to researchers and practitioners and to catalogue, summarise and categorise the content of a subset of accessible, quality guides to evaluation.
机译:背景公共卫生评估对于了解什么行得通和行不通至关重要,而对有效性的有力证明可能对确保未来的资金至关重要。尽管如此,执行程序时往往评价不佳,不完整或没有评估。公共卫生从业人员经常被要求提供其服务有效性的证据;因此,越来越需要有关如何评估公共卫生计划的评估指南。这项研究的目的是确定可供研究人员和从业人员使用的可访问的高质量评估指南,并对可访问的质量评估指南子集的内容进行分类,汇总和归类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号