首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results >Understanding FLOSS through community publications: Strategies for Grey Literature Review
【24h】

Understanding FLOSS through community publications: Strategies for Grey Literature Review

机译:了解牙线通过社区出版物:灰色文献综述策略

获取原文

摘要

Over the last decades, the Free/Libre/Open Source Software (FLOSS) phenomenon has been a topic of study and a source of real-life artifacts for software engineering research. A FLOSS project usually has a community around its project, organically producing informative resources to describe how, when, and why a particular change occurred in the source code or the development flow. Therefore, when studying this kind of project, collecting and analyzing texts and artifacts can promote a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon and the variety of organizational settings. However, despite the importance of examining Grey Literature (GL), such as technical reports, white papers, magazines, and blog posts for studying FLOSS projects, the GL Review is still an emerging technique in software engineering studies, lacking a well-established investigative methodology. To mitigate this gap, we present and discuss challenges and adaptations for the planning and execution of GL reviews in the FLOSS scenario. We provide a set of guidelines and lessons learned for further research, using, as an example, a review we are conducting on the Linux kernel development model.
机译:在过去的几十年中,自由/ Libre /开源软件(牙线)现象一直是学习的主题,以及用于软件工程研究的现实伪影源。牙线项目通常在其项目周围有一个社区,有机地生产信息丰富的信息,以描述源代码或开发流程中发生的特定变化的方式,何时以及为何。因此,在研究这种项目时,收集和分析文本和文物可以促进更全面的对现象和各种组织环境的理解。然而,尽管研究了灰色文学(GL)的重要性,例如技术报告,白皮书,杂志和博客职位,但GL审查仍然是软件工程研究中的新兴技术,缺乏良好的调查方法。为了减轻这种差距,我们展示并讨论了在牙线情景中规划和执行GL评论的挑战和适应。我们为进一步研究提供了一组指导方针和经验教训,以此为例,审查我们正在进行Linux内核开发模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号