首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas.
【2h】

Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas.

机译:两种软琼脂法体外测定人肿瘤的化学敏感性的比较:恶性黑色素瘤。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human cancers in vitro were compared with respect to colony morphology, plating efficiency (PE) and chemosensitivity of human melanomas. In 9 xenografts and 9 patients' biopsy specimens Method A (essentially that of Courtenay & Mills, 1978) gave considerably higher PE that Method B (essentially that of Hamburger & Salmon, 1977) and, in contrast to Method B, the number of colonies was proportional to the number of cells plated. Evidence was obtained that the observed differences in PE could be attributed to the low O2 concentration and the presence of rat red blood cells in Method A. Colony morphology was similar in the 2 assays. When cells from 4 xenografted melanomas were treated in vitro with DTIC, CCNU, vinblastine and abrin, and the inhibition of colony formation was assayed concurrently in the 2 soft-agar methods, the tumour cells appeared to be more sensitive to 3 of the drugs in Method B than in A. The results demonstrate that chemosensitivity data obtained with the 2 assays cannot be directly compared.
机译:比较了两种在体外测定人类癌症化学敏感性的软琼脂方法的菌落形态,铺板效率(PE)和人类黑色素瘤的化学敏感性。在9个异种移植物和9个患者的活检样本中,方法A(基本上是Courtenay&Mills,1978)比方法B(基本上是Hamburger&Salmon,1977)要高得多的PE,并且与方法B相比,菌落的数量与接种的细胞数量成正比。获得的证据表明,观察到的PE差异可能归因于方法A中的低O2浓度和大鼠红细胞的存在。两种测定的菌落形态相似。当用DTIC,CCNU,长春碱和abrin对来自4种异种黑色素瘤的细胞进行体外处理,并在2种软琼脂方法中同时测定了集落形成的抑制作用时,肿瘤细胞似乎对3种药物敏感。方法B比A中的方法多。结果表明,不能直接比较用这两种测定法获得的化学敏感性数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号