首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical and Translational Science >Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice‐Based Research Networks: A Case Study
【2h】

Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice‐Based Research Networks: A Case Study

机译:基于实践研究网络的研究良好实践共识达成的团队科学方法:一个案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using peer learning strategies, seven experienced PBRNs working in collaborative teams articulated procedures for PBRN Research Good Practices (PRGPs). The PRGPs is a PBRN‐specific resource to facilitate PBRN management and staff training, to promote adherence to study protocols, and to increase validity and generalizability of study findings. This paper describes the team science processes which culminated in the PRGPs. Skilled facilitators used team science strategies and methods from the Technology of Participation (ToP®), and the Consensus Workshop Method to support teams to codify diverse research expertise in practice‐based research. The participatory nature of “sense‐making” moved through identifiable stages. Lessons learned include (1) team input into the scope of the final outcome proved vital to project relevance; (2) PBRNs with diverse domains of research expertise contributed broad knowledge on each topic; and (3) ToP® structured facilitation techniques were critical for establishing trust and clarifying the “sense‐making” process.
机译:使用同伴学习策略,七个经验丰富的PBRN在协作团队中工作,制定了PBRN研究良好做法(PRGP)的程序。 PRGP是PBRN的专用资源,可促进PBRN的管理和人员培训,促进对研究方案的依从性,并提高研究结果的有效性和推广性。本文描述了在PRGP中达到高潮的团队科学过程。熟练的主持人使用了参与技术(ToP®)和共识研讨会方法中的团队科学策略和方法来支持团队,以汇集各种基于实践的研究专业知识。 “造假”的参与性质经过了可确定的阶段。获得的经验教训包括:(1)团队对最终结果范围的投入被证明对项目相关性至关重要; (2)具有不同研究专长的PBRN为每个主题贡献了广泛的知识; (3)ToP®的结构化促进技术对于建立信任和阐明“造谣”过程至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号