首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and translational science. >Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study
【24h】

Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study

机译:团队科学方法为基于实践的研究网络建立研究良好实践共识的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using peer learning strategies, seven experienced PBRNs working in collaborative teams articulated procedures for PBRN Research Good Practices (PRGPs). The PRGPs is a PBRN-specific resource to facilitate PBRN management and staff training, to promote adherence to study protocols, and to increase validity and generalizability of study findings. This paper describes the team science processes which culminated in the PRGPs. Skilled facilitators used team science strategies and methods from the Technology of Participation (ToP (R)), and the Consensus Workshop Method to support teams to codify diverse research expertise in practice-based research. The participatory nature of sense-making moved through identifiable stages. Lessons learned include (1) team input into the scope of the final outcome proved vital to project relevance; (2) PBRNs with diverse domains of research expertise contributed broad knowledge on each topic; and (3) ToP (R) structured facilitation techniques were critical for establishing trust and clarifying the sense-making process.
机译:使用同伴学习策略,七个经验丰富的PBRN在协作团队中工作,制定了PBRN研究良好做法(PRGP)的程序。 PRGPs是PBRN的专用资源,可促进PBRN的管理和人员培训,促进对研究方案的依从性,并提高研究结果的有效性和推广性。本文描述了在PRGP中达到高潮的团队科学过程。熟练的主持人使用了参与技术(ToP(R))和共识研讨会方法中的团队科学策略和方法来支持团队将基于实践的研究中的各种研究专业知识进行整理。决策的参与性经过了可确定的阶段。获得的经验教训包括:(1)团队对最终结果范围的投入被证明对项目相关性至关重要; (2)具有不同研究专长的PBRN为每个主题贡献了广泛的知识; (3)TOP(R)结构化的促进技术对于建立信任和阐明决策过程至关重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号