首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Scientific World Journal >Impacts of Extraction Methods in the Rapid Determination of Atrazine Residues in Foods using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Microwave Solvent vs. Supercritical Fluid Extractions
【2h】

Impacts of Extraction Methods in the Rapid Determination of Atrazine Residues in Foods using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Microwave Solvent vs. Supercritical Fluid Extractions

机译:萃取方法对超临界流体色谱和酶联免疫吸附法快速测定食品中At去津残留的影响:微波溶剂与超临界流体萃取

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is an accepted fact that many food products that we eat today have the possibility of being contaminated by various chemicals used from planting to processing. These chemicals have been shown to cause illnesses for which some concerned government agencies have instituted regulatory mechanisms to minimize the risks and the effects on humans. It is for these concerns that reliable and accurate rapid determination techniques are needed to effect proper regulatory standards for the protection of people's nutritional health. This paper, therefore, reports the comparative evaluation of the extraction methods in the determination of atrazine (commonly used in agricultural as a herbicide) residues in foods using supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and microwave solvent extraction (MSE) methods were used to test samples of frozen vegetables, fruit juice, and jam from local food markets in Houston. Results showed a high recovery percentage of atrazine residues using supercritical fluid coupled with ELISA and SFC than with MSE. Comparatively, however, atrazine was detected 90.9 and 54.5% using SFC and ELISA techniques, respectively. ELISA technique was, however, less time consuming, lower in cost, and more sensitive with low detection limit of atrazine residues than SFC technique.
机译:一个公认的事实是,我们今天食用的许多食品都有可能被从种植到加工使用的各种化学物质污染。已证明这些化学物质会引起疾病,一些有关的政府机构已针对这些疾病建立了监管机制,以最大程度地降低风险和对人类的影响。出于这些考虑,需要可靠,准确的快速测定技术来实施适当的法规标准,以保护人们的营养健康。因此,本文报告了使用超临界流体色谱(SFC)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术测定食品中阿特拉津(常用于除草剂)残留量的提取方法的比较评价。超临界流体萃取(SFE)和微波溶剂萃取(MSE)方法用于测试休斯顿当地食品市场的冷冻蔬菜,果汁和果酱样品。结果表明,与MSE相比,使用超临界流体,ELISA和SFC结合的at去津残渣的回收率高。相比之下,使用SFC和ELISA技术分别检测到阿特拉津的含量为90.9和54.5%。但是,与SFC技术相比,ELISA技术耗时少,成本低,对of去津残留的检测限低,灵敏度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号