首页> 外文期刊>ScientificWorldJournal >Impacts of Extraction Methods in the Rapid Determination of Atrazine Residues in Foods using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Microwave Solvent vs. Supercritical Fluid Extractions
【24h】

Impacts of Extraction Methods in the Rapid Determination of Atrazine Residues in Foods using Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Microwave Solvent vs. Supercritical Fluid Extractions

机译:利用超临界流体色谱法快速测定萃取方法在快速测定食品中尿嘧啶残留的影响,酶联免疫吸附试验:微波溶剂与超临界流体萃取

获取原文
       

摘要

It is an accepted fact that many food products that we eat today have the possibility of being contaminated by various chemicals used from planting to processing. These chemicals have been shown to cause illnesses for which some concerned government agencies have instituted regulatory mechanisms to minimize the risks and the effects on humans. It is for these concerns that reliable and accurate rapid determination techniques are needed to effect proper regulatory standards for the protection of people's nutritional health. This paper, therefore, reports the comparative evaluation of the extraction methods in the determination of atrazine (commonly used in agricultural as a herbicide) residues in foods using supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and microwave solvent extraction (MSE) methods were used to test samples of frozen vegetables, fruit juice, and jam from local food markets in Houston. Results showed a high recovery percentage of atrazine residues using supercritical fluid coupled with ELISA and SFC than with MSE. Comparatively, however, atrazine was detected 90.9 and 54.5% using SFC and ELISA techniques, respectively. ELISA technique was, however, less time consuming, lower in cost, and more sensitive with low detection limit of atrazine residues than SFC technique.
机译:它是一个接受的事实,即我们今天吃的许多食品有可能被用于种植到加工的各种化学品污染的可能性。这些化学品已被证明导致一些有关政府机构的疾病所制定的监管机制,以尽量减少风险和对人类的影响。这是为了这些担忧,需要可靠和准确的快速测定技术来影响保护人民营养健康的适当监管标准。因此,本文报告了使用超临界流体色谱(SFC)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术在食品中测定食品中阿特拉津(通常用于除草剂)残留物的提取方法的比较评价。超临界流体萃取(SFE)和微波溶剂萃取(MSE)方法用于从休斯顿的当地食品市场测试冷冻蔬菜,果汁和果酱的样品。结果显示使用超临界流体与ELISA和SFC偶联的超临界残留物的高恢复百分比小于MSE。然而,相比之下,分别使用SFC和ELISA技术检测到阿特拉嗪90.9和54.5%。然而,ELISA技术较少,成本较低,并且对尿嘧啶残留的低检测极限比SFC技术更低,更敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号