【2h】

The endosymbiotic origin diversification and fate of plastids

机译:内质共生的起源质体的多样性和命运

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Plastids and mitochondria each arose from a single endosymbiotic event and share many similarities in how they were reduced and integrated with their host. However, the subsequent evolution of the two organelles could hardly be more different: mitochondria are a stable fixture of eukaryotic cells that are neither lost nor shuffled between lineages, whereas plastid evolution has been a complex mix of movement, loss and replacement. Molecular data from the past decade have substantially untangled this complex history, and we now know that plastids are derived from a single endosymbiotic event in the ancestor of glaucophytes, red algae and green algae (including plants). The plastids of both red algae and green algae were subsequently transferred to other lineages by secondary endosymbiosis. Green algal plastids were taken up by euglenids and chlorarachniophytes, as well as one small group of dinoflagellates. Red algae appear to have been taken up only once, giving rise to a diverse group called chromalveolates. Additional layers of complexity come from plastid loss, which has happened at least once and probably many times, and replacement. Plastid loss is difficult to prove, and cryptic, non-photosynthetic plastids are being found in many non-photosynthetic lineages. In other cases, photosynthetic lineages are now understood to have evolved from ancestors with a plastid of different origin, so an ancestral plastid has been replaced with a new one. Such replacement has taken place in several dinoflagellates (by tertiary endosymbiosis with other chromalveolates or serial secondary endosymbiosis with a green alga), and apparently also in two rhizarian lineages: chlorarachniophytes and Paulinella (which appear to have evolved from chromalveolate ancestors). The many twists and turns of plastid evolution each represent major evolutionary transitions, and each offers a glimpse into how genomes evolve and how cells integrate through gene transfers and protein trafficking.
机译:质体和线粒体各自起源于一次共生共生事件,在减少和整合宿主方面有着许多相似之处。但是,两个细胞器的后续进化几乎没有什么不同:线粒体是真核细胞的稳定固定体,在谱系之间​​既不丢失也不被拖曳,而质体进化则是运动,丢失和替换的复杂结合。过去十年的分子数据已使这种复杂的历史大为混乱,我们现在知道,质体源自青藻,红藻和绿藻(包括植物)祖先的一次共生共生事件。红藻和绿藻的质体随后通过继发性内共生转移到其他谱系。绿藻质和绿藻藻类以及一小类鞭毛藻吸收了绿藻质体。红藻似乎只被吸收了一次,形成了称为色藻酸酯的不同种类。质体损失会增加额外的复杂性,质体损失至少发生过一次,可能发生了很多次,而且还发生了替换。质体损失难以证明,并且在许多非光合谱系中发现了隐秘的非光合质体。在其他情况下,现在人们认为光合谱系是从具有不同起源质体的祖先进化而来的,因此祖先质体已被新的质体替代。这种替换发生在几种鞭毛鞭毛虫中(通过与其他铬藻酸酯的第三代共生或通过绿藻的系列继发性内共生),以及显然也存在于两个根瘤菌谱系中:绿藻纲和波林氏菌(它们似乎是从嗜铬酸盐祖先进化而来)。质体进化的许多曲折都代表着主要的进化过渡,并且每一个都提供了基因组如何进化以及细胞如何通过基因转移和蛋白质运输整合的一瞥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号