首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories
【2h】

Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories

机译:速度问题:眼球运动速度与厌恶自传体记忆变化之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is an efficacious treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. In EMDR, patients recall a distressing memory and simultaneously make eye movements (EM). Both tasks are considered to require limited working memory (WM) resources. Because this leaves fewer resources available for memory retrieval, the memory should become less vivid and less emotional during future recall. In EMDR analogue studies, a standardized procedure has been used, in which participants receive the same dual task manipulation of 1 EM cycle per second (1 Hz). From a WM perspective, the WM taxation of the dual task might be titrated to the WM taxation of the memory image. We hypothesized that highly vivid images are more affected by high WM taxation and less vivid images are more affected by low WM taxation. In study 1, 34 participants performed a reaction time task, and rated image vividness, and difficulty of retrieving an image, during five speeds of EM and no EM. Both a high WM taxing frequency (fast EM; 1.2 Hz) and a low WM taxing frequency (slow EM; 0.8 Hz) were selected. In study 2, 72 participants recalled three highly vivid aversive autobiographical memory images (n = 36) or three less vivid images (n = 36) under each of three conditions: recall + fast EM, recall + slow EM, or recall only. Multi-level modeling revealed a consistent pattern for all outcome measures: recall + fast EM led to less emotional, less vivid and more difficult to retrieve images than recall + slow EM and recall only, and the effects of recall + slow EM felt consistently in between the effects of recall + fast EM and recall only, but only differed significantly from recall + fast EM. Crucially, image vividness did not interact with condition on the decrease of emotionality over time, which was inconsistent with the prediction. Implications for understanding the mechanisms of action in memory modification and directions for future research are discussed.
机译:眼球运动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)是一种有效的治疗创伤后应激障碍的方法。在EMDR中,患者会回忆起令人痛苦的记忆,并同时进行眼球运动(EM)。这两个任务都被认为需要有限的工作内存(WM)资源。由于这将使可用于记忆检索的资源减少,因此在将来的召回中,记忆应变得不那么生动,不那么情绪化。在EMDR模拟研究中,已使用标准化程序,其中参与者接受相同的双重任务操纵,即每秒1个EM周期(1 Hz)。从WM的角度来看,双重任务的WM税收可能会被定为内存映像的WM税收。我们假设高生动度图像受较高的WM税影响,而较不生动的图像受较低的WM税影响。在研究1中,在EM的五种速度和无EM的速度下,有34名参与者执行了反应时间任务,并对图像的鲜艳度和图像检索的难度进行了评级。选择了较高的WM收费频率(快速EM; 1.2 Hz)和较低的WM收费频率(慢EM; 0.8 Hz)。在研究2中,有72名参与者在以下三个条件下分别回忆了三个高度生动的厌恶自传自传记忆图像(n = 36)或三个不太生动的自传性记忆图像(n = 36):分别回忆起+快速EM,回忆起+慢速EM或仅回忆。多级建模揭示了所有结果度量的一致模式:召回+快速EM导致的情绪比回忆+慢速EM和仅召回要少,生动度更低,更难于检索图像,而召回+慢速EM的效果始终如一。在召回+快速EM效果和仅召回之间,但仅与召回+快速EM有显着差异。至关重要的是,随着时间的流逝情绪下降,图像的生动性与条件没有相互作用,这与预测结果不一致。讨论了理解记忆修改中的作用机制和未来研究方向的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号