【2h】

The practice of simulation-based assessment in respiratory therapy education

机译:基于模拟的评估在呼吸治疗教育中的实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical simulation has gained prominence as an educational approach in many Canadian respiratory therapy programs and is strongly associated with improved learning, clinical and nonclinical skill, future performance, and patient outcomes. Traditionally, the primary assessment approach employed in clinical simulation has been formative debriefing for learning. Contextual factors, such as limited opportunities for learning in clinical practice and technologically oriented perspectives on learning in clinical simulation, are converging to prompt a move from using formative debriefing sessions that support learning in simulation to employing high-stakes testing intended to measure entry-to-practice competencies. We adopt the perspective that these factors are intricately linked to the profession’s regulatory environment, which may strongly influence how simulation practices become embedded with respiratory therapy educational programs. Through this discussion we challenge the profession to consider how environmental factors, including externally derived requirements, may ultimately impact the effectiveness of simulation-based learning environments.
机译:在许多加拿大呼吸治疗计划中,临床模拟已作为一种教育方法而受到重视,并且与学习,临床和非临床技能,未来表现以及患者预后的改善密切相关。传统上,临床模拟中采用的主要评估方法是用于学习的形成性汇报。诸如在临床实践中学习的机会有限以及在临床模拟中学习的以技术为导向的观点之类的背景因素正在融合,促使人们从使用支持模拟学习的形成性汇报会议转向采用旨在测试进入的高风险测试。 -实践能力。我们认为这些因素与该行业的法规环境错综复杂地联系在一起,这可能会极大地影响模拟方法在呼吸疗法教育计划中的嵌入方式。通过讨论,我们向专业人士提出挑战,以考虑环境因素(包括外部派生的要求)如何最终影响基于模拟的学习环境的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号