首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biosecurity and Bioterrorism : Biodefense Strategy Practice and Science >BSL-3 Laboratory Practices in the United States: Comparison of Select Agent and Non–Select Agent Facilities
【2h】

BSL-3 Laboratory Practices in the United States: Comparison of Select Agent and Non–Select Agent Facilities

机译:美国的BSL-3实验室惯例:精选代理机构和非精选代理机构的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New construction of biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) laboratories in the United States has increased in the past decade to facilitate research on potential bioterrorism agents. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention inspect BSL-3 facilities and review commissioning documentation, but no single agency has oversight over all BSL-3 facilities. This article explores the extent to which standard operating procedures in US BSL-3 facilities vary between laboratories with select agent or non–select agent status. Comparisons are made for the following variables: personnel training, decontamination, personal protective equipment (PPE), medical surveillance, security access, laboratory structure and maintenance, funding, and pest management. Facilities working with select agents had more complex training programs and decontamination procedures than non–select agent facilities. Personnel working in select agent laboratories were likely to use powered air purifying respirators, while non–select agent laboratories primarily used N95 respirators. More rigorous medical surveillance was carried out in select agent workers (although not required by the select agent program) and a higher level of restrictive access to laboratories was found. Most select agent and non–select agent laboratories reported adequate structural integrity in facilities; however, differences were observed in personnel perception of funding for repairs. Pest management was carried out by select agent personnel more frequently than non–select agent personnel. Our findings support the need to promote high quality biosafety training and standard operating procedures in both select agent and non–select agent laboratories to improve occupational health and safety.
机译:在过去的十年中,美国新建立了生物安全3级实验室(BSL-3),以促进对潜在生物恐怖分子的研究。疾病控制与预防中心检查BSL-3设施并审查调试文档,但是没有一个机构可以监督所有BSL-3设施。本文探讨了在具有选择代理或非选择代理状态的实验室之间,美国BSL-3设施中标准操作程序的差异程度。对以下变量进行了比较:人员培训,净化,个人防护设备(PPE),医疗监视,安全通道,实验室结构和维护,资金以及有害生物管理。与非特选代理商的设施相比,与特选代理商合作的设施的培训计划和去污程序更为复杂。在某些特选实验室工作的人员可能会使用动力空气净化呼吸器,而非特选实验室主要使用N95呼吸器。选择代理人的工人进行了更严格的医疗监督(尽管选择代理人计划没有要求),并且发现进入实验室的限制程度更高。多数精选代理商和非精选代理商实验室报告说,设施具有足够的结构完整性。但是,在人员对维修资金的看法上存在差异。虫害管理是由非特选人员更频繁地由特选人员进行的。我们的发现支持需要在精选代理商和非精选代理商实验室中促进高质量的生物安全培训和标准操作程序,以改善职业健康和安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号