The argument"teaching in accordance of student's gender"doesn't show the rationality on the content,since it relies on gender essentialism, a vulnerable theoretical base, and shows jumbled logics such as shifting arguing center, antinomy, and reversing cause and effect during demonstration, and causes consequences such as enhancing gender stereotypes, reproducing gender inequality. It also doesn't have legitimacy in form relying on"teaching in accordance of student's aptitude". These two forms are opposite:the former has collective character on objects,closure on implication,and power on function,while the latter has characters such as individuality,openness,and capability. It is gender sensitive education represents the development direction of educational gender equality, finding a way of duplicating problems of gender in education,because it doesn't only acknowledge the status quo of gender, but also promotes dialogue between gender cultures, encourages diffusion of gender characters, and strives for a world that transcends gender disposition.%"因性施教"以脆弱的性别本质主义为理论基础,在论证中显露出中心漂移、自相矛盾、颠倒因果等混乱逻辑,并导致强化性别刻板印象、再生产性别不平等的后果,不具备内容上的合理性."因性施教"在对象上的群体性、内涵上的封闭性、功能上的权力性,与因材施教的个体性、开放性和能力性根本对立,不能借因材施教而获得形式上的合法性.性别敏感教育正视既存性别事实,促进性别文化对话,又鼓励性别气质交融,努力超越性别设定,代表着教育性别平等的发展方向,是教育解决性别问题的根本出路.
展开▼
