In recent years, the judicial practice of criminal retrial has shown that the system design of the trial supervision procedure has many defects and deficiencies , for example , the design of the authorized body of starting the retrial procedure is unreasonable , the reason and procedure of starting the retrial is not specific , and the statute of limitation and number of times of starting the retrial is unlimited .Based on the general principles of criminal procedure and interests balance , combined with the problems and defi-ciencies of the current criminal retrial procedure exposed in judicial practice , the authors advocate that we should stick to the following values in reforming and improving the system design of the criminal trial supervision procedure:to make efforts to achieve a reasonable balance between fighting crimes and pro-tecting human rights , to realize the substantive justice on the premise of highlighting the procedural jus-tice, to give priority to meet the litigation justice but not neglect the litigation efficiency , and to adhere to support the judicial adjudication with the legal facts .Thus, in the process of improving the criminal trial supervision procedure system , we should fully guarantee the right of appeal of the parties , their legal a-gents and close relatives , and at the same time cancellthe courts the right of starting the criminal retrial;define clearly and specifically the reasons of starting a criminal retrial;limit the term and number of crim-inal retrial and strictly follow the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” and eliminate the adjudica-tion of “a suspected crime”.%近年来的刑事再审司法实践表明，现行审判监督程序制度设计存在诸多缺陷与不足，比如再审程序的启动主体设计不合理，提起再审程序的事由与程序要求不具体，提起再审程序的时效及次数未做限制，等等。基于刑事诉讼程序一般原理以及利益衡量原则，结合司法实践中暴露出的现行刑事再审程序之问题和不足，改革和完善刑事审判监督程序制度设计应坚持以下价值取向：努力实现打击犯罪与保障人权之间的合理衡平，突出程序公正前提下兼顾实体公正，优先满足诉讼公正的同时不可偏废诉讼效率，坚持以法律事实支持司法裁判。在刑事审判监督程序制度完善过程中，要在充分保障当事人及其法定代理人和近亲属的申诉权的同时，取消法院刑事再审提起权；明确和具体界定刑事再审提起事由；限制刑事再审提起期间及次数；严格遵循“疑罪从无”原则，排除“疑罪从轻”裁判。
展开▼
