侵犯商业秘密罪故意形态之再提倡--以刑法解释学为视角

摘要

The analysis of the controversial views on different forms of infringing business secrets is conducive to achieve an overview about it. The theory of Criminal Law Interpretation is an independent knowledge. We can have overall understanding through its basic interpretation. From the perspective of Criminal Law Interpretation, we can systematically explain the ontological object in the 219th article in“Criminal Law” with the methodologies (literal and logical interpretation) so as to reverse the subjective offense of infringing business secrets. The conclusion is:the subjective offense is intentional, including direct and indirect intentions.%辨析侵犯商业秘密罪罪过形态的各种争议观点，有利于对侵犯商业秘密罪的罪过形态形成整体概观。刑法解释学是一门具有独立品格的学问，通过对刑法解释学的基本解读形成对刑法解释学总体认识；从刑法解释学的视角出发，以方法论意义上的刑法解释方法即文理解释和论理解释，对本体论上的刑法解释对象即《刑法》第219条进行体系化解释，以反向考察侵犯商业秘密罪的主观罪过形态。结论：侵犯商业秘密罪的主观罪过形态只能是故意，且包括直接故意和间接故意。