It is necessary to separate the disputes between objectivism and subjectivism in criminal law studies from other controversies between objective theories and subjective theories in this field. The de-bate between objectivism and subjectivism has two dimensions in its meaning. The first concerns such a question as whether the object of punishment is infringement of legal goods or personal danger. The second is about the theory of wrongdoing,that is,whether the establishment of wrongdoing is decided according to the objective aspect of an act or an actor's guilty intention. The debate between objectiv-ism and subjectivism in China is still in its infancy,and there is some confusion over the basic con-cepts between the parties involved in the debate. As for the Chinese criminal law,it is more reasona-ble to decide its position according to the above-mentioned two dimensions. In the first case,we should adopt the position of objectivism;in the second,however,subjectivism constrained by objectiv-ism is a better choice. This is the position held by a dualistic theory of Handlungsunwert which is based on the infringement of legal goods.% 与学派之争无关的主客观争议，有必要从刑法中客观主义与主观主义之争中予以剥离。刑法中客观主义与主观主义之争，其意义可分为两个维度。第一维度的客观主义与主观主义之争涉及刑罚对象的争论，即刑罚的对象究竟是对法益的侵害还是行为人的人身危险性；第二维度的客观主义与主观主义之争乃是在不法论意义上而言，即不法的成立是根据行为的客观面或是行为人的主观意思进行判断。客观主义与主观主义之争在我国刑法学中尚未真正展开，双方的论争缺乏针对性，且在概念的指涉与运用上充满混乱。就我国刑法的立场问题而言，有必要根据客观主义与主观主义之争的不同维度进行立场选择。在第一维度的客观主义与主观主义之争中，应采客观主义；在第二维度的客观主义与主观主义之争中，应采受客观主义严格约束的主观论，即一种以法益侵害为基础的二元的行为无价值论。
展开▼
