钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》特论陈澧之原因析论

摘要

陈澧作为一个讲学著述终老的普通经生,在学术史上并没有像康有为等人能在晚清思想界留有重要轨迹,而钱穆却在《中国近三百年学术史》中将陈澧单列一章,并且致以＂拳拳向往之意＂。其原因是多方面的,一方面在于陈澧所处的时代与钱穆相似,即他们都处于学风转变的特殊时代;另一方面是缘于钱穆的高度社会责任感,因陈澧对于新学风的提倡而颇合钱穆＂求人才,转世运＂的殷切之望。%As an ordinary Confucian from cradle to grave, Chen li didn＇t play an important role in the academic history like Kang You wei in late Qing dynasty. Qian mu set up a chapter for Chen li and showed ＂a very admiring meaning＂ in his Chinese Academic History in Almost Three Hundred Years. This reflected Qian mu＇s subjective judgment for academic contexts. The reasons are various. On the one hand, there exist time similarities of Chen li and Qian mu, that is, they are in special times of study change. On the other hand, it is due to a high social sense of Qian mu, because Chen li＇s advocating for a new style of study complies with Qian mu＇s earnest hope of ＂seeking talents, reincarnation luck＂.