从几何意义上说，如果某一个宪法权利具有界限，那么这个界限的起点，正是对该权利保障的终点。知情权与隐私权作为法律所确认和维护的两项基本权利，无论从理论层面还是实证角度考察，都存在不可避免的冲突。在调和冲突时既不应先验地偏重保护任何一方，也不能机械地划定二者的界限。在比较借鉴的基础上，结合我国现实情况，通过在民法规范中设置一般条款来实现对宪法性权利的转介功能；而裁判者在适用规范时，需要采用实质判断的方法对冲突双方进行利益衡量。% From the geometric sense, if constitutional rights have limits, the starting point of boundaries is the end of protecting the rights. The right to know and the right of privacy, as two fundamental rights recognized and maintained by law, are inevitably conflicting with each other no matter from the theoretical level or the empirical research. When reconciling the conflict, we should neither put a priori emphasis on the protection of any party, nor mechanically demarcate the boundaries. On the basis of comparative reference, combined with China's realities, general terms of civil law should be set to realize the function of constitutional rights, and judgment should be made to measure the interests of both parties during the application of laws.
展开▼
