It has been endlessly debated whether or not person without status and person with status can be complicity of standard status crime and the answer is undoubtedly negative from the nature of status and the penalty for the standard status crime .The fact that person without status takes advantage of other ’ s duty to help him imple-ment theft may lead to different crimes according to the theory of status crime and the theory of principal offender behavior respectively .The key point lies in the understanding of the nature of status and behaviors so as to compre-hensively evaluate the objective behaviors of the person with specific status .Therefore , it should be defined as the common crime when a person without status takes advantage of other ’ s duty to help him implement theft , while it is the status crime when a person with status takes advantage of his duty to injure the interests of the company .%无身份者与身份者能否成为纯正身份犯的共犯问题，理论界一直争议不休，但可以确定从身份的本质和纯正身份犯刑罚设置等角度分析应当是否定的。无身份者利用身份犯的职务便利帮助其实施盗窃行为，按照身份犯说和主犯行为说得出的却是不同的犯罪定性。行为定性的关键应当在于对身份的本质理解和对行为的性质分解，从而全面评价特定身份者的客观行为，无身份者收买特定身份者主管职权为其盗窃行为提供便利按普通犯罪处理，而有身份者出卖职权为他人谋利、隐瞒，损害公司利益的行为，必须结合其身份的法律意义成立身份犯罪。
展开▼
