间接故意与过于自信的过失之区分研究

摘要

Common theory makes a logical mistake in distinguishing between the indirect intention and the over-confident negligence, which is not conducive to the protection of legal interests and human rights. Over-confi-dent negligence should be limited to two situations:(1) Under a specific context, every ordinary person would a-gree that it doesn't exist any danger;(2) The offender is aware of the possibility of the occurrence of a crime, but for the benefit of the victims, he has to resort. So the difference between the indirect intention and the over-confi-dent negligence is whether or not the offender can keep others' legal interests under control.%通说对于放任的故意和过于自信的区别存在逻辑上的错误，不利于保护法益，也不利于保障人权。过于自信过失仅限于两种情况：一是在具体的背景下，以一般人的视角进行观察，认为不会有任何危险的。二是行为人认识了构成犯罪事实发生的可能性，但为了被害人的利益不得不为之的。放任与过于自信的区别在于：行为人能否将他人的法益掌控在自己的手中。