中美翻转课堂研究的可视化比较分析及其启示

摘要

Using the visualization software of CiteSpace, analyzing core literature of the flipped classroom in China and US from the perspective of comparative(the literatures data is separately searched from CSSCI and Web of Science core database), can ob-jectively present the study of similarities and differences between the two countries. According to this research the paper can find that the knowledge base of the flipped classroom study in two countries is the same basically, and research hotspots overlap obviously. The differences between two countries are as follows:China literature grows faster but is not stable, and the subjects are centralized distri-bution. American literature grows faster and is stable, and the subjects have a wide distribution. China research is still in the internal discussion within pedagogy discipline, but American research has been carried out in chemical education, engineering education, medicine education and other extensive fields. We can draw some inspirations from the results of the comparison that domestic re-search should make efforts from simple imitation to western-body Chinese-use, from policy dependency to making recommendations, from model construction to problem solving and from subject exploring to field sharing.%利用CiteSpace可视化软件，从比较视角分析中美翻转课堂领域的核心文献（文献分别来自于CSSCI与WOS核心合集数据库），能够客观呈现两国研究的异同。研究发现，中美翻转课堂研究的知识基础较为相似，研究热点有部分重叠，有所区别的是：国内文献增速较快但并不稳定，且学科分布集中，美国文献逐年递增并相对稳定，学科分布广泛；国内研究受教育政策制度的影响更大，美国研究在学者合作程度与对相关领域关注度方面占优；国内研究仍停留于教育学学科内部的探讨，而美国研究已在化学教育、工程教育以及医学教育等领域广泛开展。对比的结果对国内研究的启示在于：应努力从简单模仿走向西体中用，从政策依赖走向建言献策，从模式构建走向问题解决，从学科探究走向领域共享。