首页> 外文期刊>针灸推拿医学(英文版) >针刺治疗老年感音神经性耳聋患者疗效与耳闷胀感的相关分析
【24h】

针刺治疗老年感音神经性耳聋患者疗效与耳闷胀感的相关分析

机译:针刺治疗老年感音神经性耳聋患者疗效与耳闷胀感的相关分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective:To investigate the relationship between clinical effects of acupuncture for elderly patients with sensorineural deafness and ear distending sensation.Methods:A total of 120 elderly patients with sensorineural deafness were randomly divided into a comprehensive treatment group,an acupuncture group and a Western medicine group,with 40 cases in each group.The acupuncture group received acupuncture treatment,the Western medicine group received oral mecobalamin tablets and the comprehensive treatment group received acupuncture plus acupoint injection and auricular acupoint sticking.The values of pure tone hearing threshold test of the three groups were observed before and after treatment,and the relationship between clinical effects and ear distending sensation was compared.Results:The total effective rate of the comprehensive treatment group was 82.5% versus 67.0% in the acupuncture group and 62.5% in the Western medicine group.The inter-group comparisons showed statistically significant differences in the comprehensive treatment group versus the Western medicine group (P<0.01) and the acupuncture group (P<0.05).In the comprehensive treatment group,there were 23 cases (57.5%) with ear distending sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 86.9%;there were 17 cases (42.5%) without the sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 76.5%.In the acupuncture group,there were 24 cases (60.0%) with ear distending sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 71.0%;there were 16 cases (40.0%) without the sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 63.0%.In the Western medicine group,there were 21 cases (52.5%) with ear distending sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 66.7%;there were 19 cases (47.5%) without the sensation,the clinical total effective rate was 57.9%.The total effective rate of patients with ear distending sensation were higher than the rates of those without ear distending sensation in the three groups,but the differences were insignificant (all P>0.05).Conclusion:The comprehensive therapy is one of the effective methods to treat elderly patients with sensorineural deafness.In the three groups of elderly patients with sensorineural deafness,the relief of ear distending sensation and the hearing loss were basically simultaneous,and the hearing recovery in the patients with ear distending sensation may be slightly better than that in those without ear distending sensation.Nevertheless,further research is needed.%目的:探讨针刺治疗老年感音神经性耳聋患者疗效与耳闷胀感之间的关系.方法:采用随机对照方法将120例老年感音神经性耳聋的患者分为综合治疗组、针刺组和西药组,每组40例.针刺组给予针刺治疗;西药组采用口服甲钴胺片剂治疗;综合治疗组给予针刺配合穴位注射及耳穴贴压治疗.观察三组治疗前后患者纯音听阈测试值的变化,并比较耳闷胀感与疗效之间的关系.结果:综合治疗组、针刺组和西药组临床总有效率分别是82.5%、67.0%和62.5%;组间临床疗效比较:综合治疗组明显优于西药组(P<0.01)和针刺组(P<0.05).综合治疗组中伴耳闷胀者23例(57.5%),临床总有效率为86.9%;无耳闷胀者17例(42.5%),临床总有效率为76.5%.针刺组中伴耳闷胀者24例(60.0%),临床总有效率为71.0%;无耳闷胀者16例(40.0%),临床总有效率为63.0%.西药组中伴耳闷胀者21例(52.5%),临床总有效率为66.7%;无耳闷胀者19例(47.5%),临床总有效率为57.9%.三组有耳闷胀的患者的总有效率均高于同组无耳闷胀者,但差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论:综合疗法是治疗老年感音神经性耳聋的有效方法之一.三组老年感音神经性耳聋患者耳闷胀症状的缓解与听力恢复情况基本上是平行的,且伴有耳闷胀感的患者听力恢复效果可能会略好于不伴有耳闷胀者,但尚需进一步研究.
机译:目的:探讨针刺对老年患者临床疗效与耳朵呼声呼吸症临床影响的关系。方法:将120例感觉神经耳聋​​患者随机分为综合治疗组,针灸组和西医结合,每组40例患者。针灸组接受针灸治疗,西医结合接受口服牛皮酰胺片和综合治疗组接受针灸加穴位注射和耳廓穴位粘连。三组纯音听力阈值试验的价值在治疗之前和之后观察到,比较临床效果和耳朵之间的关系。结果:综合治疗组的总有效率为82.5%,针灸组67.0%,西医结合62.5%。群体间比较显示统计学上综合治疗组与西药组(P <0.01)和针灸组(P <0.05)的差异。在综合治疗组中,有23例(57.5%)耳朵偏远感,临床总有效率为86.9%;没有感觉有17例(42.5%),临床总有效率为76.5%。在针灸组中,有24例(60.0%)耳朵偏远感,临床总有效率71.0%;有16例(40.0%)没有感觉,临床总有效率为63.0%。西医结合,有21例(52.5%)耳朵偏向轰动,临床总有效率为66.7 %;没有感觉有19例(47.5%),临床总有效率为57.9%。耳朵偏远感觉的患者的总有效率高于三组没有耳距感觉的患者的速度高,但是差异是没有忽略(所有p> 0.05)。结论:综合治疗是治疗老年人感觉耳聋患者的有效方法之一。在三组的老年人感觉耳聋患者中,耳朵偏远感的缓解和听力损失基本上是同时发生,耳朵扩散感的患者中的听力恢复可能略大于那些没有耳扩散感的人中的患者。无论如何,需要进一步的研究。%目的:探讨针刺治疗老年感音神经性患者疗效与耳方法:使用手机对照方法将120例少年感音神经性的患者综治疗组,针刺组和西部,每组40例。针刺组针刺组针刺治疗;西部采采口服治疗;结合治疗组治疗组给予针刺刺配穴位注射及耳穴贴压贴压音穴位组治疗前后患者患者音音阈的的治疗患者患者纯的的的的的,的的的的的,,的,,,的的的的耳闷耳闷耳闷胀感耳闷耳闷耳闷耳闷耳闷胀感耳闷胀感之之之之之之之之之结果:综合性治疗组,针刺组和西药组临床总效率分裂是82.5%,67.0%和62.5%;空间临床疗效比较:综合治疗组明显优于西北(P <0.01)和针刺组(P <0.05)。结合治疗组中间23例(57.5%),临床总有为为86.9%;无耳闷胀者17例(42.5%),临床别无为76.5%。针刺组中炎24‰(60.0%),临床总有留置为71.0%;无耳闷胀者16例(40.0%),临床销有为63.0%。西北中伴耳闷胀者21例(52.5%),临床总别为66.7%;无耳闷胀者19例(47.5%),临床销有为57.9%。三是有毛的总有效率均高度同组无耳闷胀者,但差异均无统计统计意义(均p> 0.05)。结论:结合卫法是治疗老年感音神经性神经性神经性神经性的有方法之一。三组长年人感音神经性耳聋耳聋患者耳闷胀症状的缓解与听力恢复情况基本上是平行的,且别没有耳闷的患者东西可以〖choughers〗好的不起作者胀者,但尚需进一流研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号