首页> 外文学位 >A Cautionary Tale from Nevada’s Desert-People before Company: A Case Study on Economic Development Approaches in Nevada
【24h】

A Cautionary Tale from Nevada’s Desert-People before Company: A Case Study on Economic Development Approaches in Nevada

机译:内华达州沙漠人的警示故事——公司之前的人:内华达州经济发展方法的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project utilized a mixed methods research design consisting of a case study of Nevada to explain the state's reliance on company-based government incentives to attract new businesses to the state. Additionally, the project applied a comparative analysis of Brazil's and Tennessee's use of company-based government incentives, and a more detailed comparative analysis of Virginia's people-based government incentive approach to economic development incentives to explore policy alternatives available to decision makers. This project used the historical institutionalism approach to show how policymakers have certain institutionally dominated predispositions impacting policy outcomes leading to a path dependency where rational choice theory's credit seeking behavior further reinforces the desire to provide company-based incentives over people-based incentives. Additionally, this project discussed how the creative class theory provides an alternative approach to help channel policy preferences toward people-based incentives for policymakers prone to rent seeking corporations pursuing company-based incentives. The concept and definition of workplace is changing. The connectedness of global markets and supply chains combined with advanced technology are disconnecting companies from specific geographic locations giving them an increasing ability to more freely expand or relocate. Business closures, realignments, and work from home protocols associated with the COVID-19 global pandemic have further transformed, if not destroyed, the notion of workplace and corporate commitment to local. The comparative analysis of this project informs policymakers facing this new reality by evaluating whether prospective companies prefer government investments in company-based economic development or investments in people-based economic development.This project used a case study of Tesla's September 2014 decision to build its first Gigafactory for manufacturing batteries in Sparks, Nevada. The project also compared Amazon's September 2017 decision to build its HQ2 corporate headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. More specifically, the project highlighted the lessons Nevada and other state's beginning to establish and implement economic development tools, designed to attract new enterprise to their state, can learn from states more experienced and successful in economic development endeavors. The primary units of analysis for this project were the metro areas of Reno, Nevada; Las Vegas, Nevada; Washington, D.C. Metro Region; and the surrounding areas impacted by the project, and the state. The case study of Nevada offered a unique perspective and contribution to existing literature in urban affairs and public policy, if not a laboratory for study, as a state with a rich tradition of reliance on stable historic rent seeking enterprises suddenly pivoted and realigned state law and institutions to diversifying its economy following the Great Recession. As one of the least diverse states in the Nation, Nevada provides a blank canvas to analyze the evolution of government institutions, public policy, and the effectiveness of incentives designed to attract new diversification. The comparative analysis of Amazon in Virginia provided strong comparative value to understanding policy evolution and the value businesses place on people or company-based economic incentives. Additionally, the Amazon analysis looked at the company's bifurcated decision to locate in Virginia and New York and how those states used company- and people-based approaches to attract their part of the opportunity. Following a more traditional incrementalism approach where inherently stable institutions of policy subsystems develop over time, Virginia made significant historical investments in people and utilized smaller company-based incentives to attractbusiness.This project utilized content analysis, in-depth semi-structured interviews, and document analysis of legislative records. This stu
机译:该项目采用混合方法研究设计,包括内华达州的案例研究,以解释该州依赖基于公司的政府激励措施来吸引新企业到该州。此外,该项目还对巴西和田纳西州使用基于公司的政府激励措施进行了比较分析,并对弗吉尼亚州以人为本的政府激励方法进行了更详细的比较分析,以探索决策者可用的政策替代方案。该项目使用历史制度主义方法来展示政策制定者如何具有某些制度主导的倾向,从而影响政策结果,导致路径依赖,其中理性选择理论的信用寻求行为进一步强化了提供基于公司的激励而不是基于人的激励的愿望。此外,该项目还讨论了创造性阶级理论如何提供一种替代方法,以帮助将政策偏好引导到以人为本的激励措施上,以便政策制定者倾向于寻求基于公司的租金公司。工作场所的概念和定义正在发生变化。全球市场和供应链的连通性与先进技术相结合,使公司与特定地理位置脱节,使它们能够更自由地扩张或搬迁。与 COVID-19 全球大流行相关的企业关闭、重组和在家工作协议进一步改变了工作场所的概念和企业对本地的承诺。该项目的比较分析通过评估潜在公司是更喜欢政府对公司经济发展的投资还是对以人为本的经济发展的投资,为面对这一新现实的政策制定者提供了信息。该项目以特斯拉2014年9月决定在内华达州斯帕克斯建造其第一个用于制造电池的超级工厂为例。该项目还比较了亚马逊 2017 年 9 月在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿建立其 HQ2 公司总部的决定。更具体地说,该项目强调了内华达州和其他州开始建立和实施经济发展工具的经验教训,旨在吸引新企业到他们的州,可以向在经济发展方面更有经验和成功的州学习。该项目的主要分析单位是内华达州里诺的都会区;内华达州拉斯维加斯;华盛顿特区都会区;以及受项目影响的周边地区和州。内华达州的案例研究为城市事务和公共政策方面的现有文献提供了独特的视角和贡献,如果不是研究的实验室,因为一个拥有依赖稳定历史寻租企业的丰富传统的州突然转向并重新调整州法律和机构,以实现经济多元化在大萧条之后。作为全美最不多元化的州之一,内华达州为分析政府机构、公共政策的演变以及旨在吸引新多元化的激励措施的有效性提供了空白画布。对亚马逊在弗吉尼亚州的比较分析为理解政策演变以及企业对人或基于公司的经济激励措施的价值提供了强大的比较价值。此外,亚马逊的分析还研究了该公司在弗吉尼亚州和纽约州落户的分叉决定,以及这些州如何使用基于公司和人员的方法来吸引他们的部分机会。遵循更传统的渐进主义方法,即随着时间的推移,内在稳定的政策子系统机构不断发展,弗吉尼亚州对人员进行了重大的历史投资,并利用较小的基于公司的激励措施来吸引企业。该项目利用了内容分析、深入的半结构化访谈和立法记录的文件分析。这个 stu

著录项

  • 作者

    Juden, Ryann P.S.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Nevada, Las Vegas.;
  • 学科 Public policy.;Political science.;Public administration.
  • 学位
  • 年度 2022
  • 页码 235
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Public policy.; Political science.; Public administration.;

    机译:公共政策。政治学.;公共行政。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号