首页> 外文学位 >Evidence-Based Practices for Autism Spectrum Disorders: Through the Eyes of Practitioners
【24h】

Evidence-Based Practices for Autism Spectrum Disorders: Through the Eyes of Practitioners

机译:自闭症谱系障碍的循证实践:从业者的眼光

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to begin the work of closing the current research-to-practice gap for evidence-based practices (EBP) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study looked at the professional wisdom side of the EBPs for ASD through the eyes of the professionals in the field of education. It provides more insight into how the EBPs are being interpreted and applied with students on the autism spectrum.;This descriptive research project was based on the work from National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC on ASD) during the years 2007--2012 and compared the answers obtained from practitioners through a researcher-created survey. Specifically, I utilized the chart that showed the 24 EBPs categorized by age and domains of autism. The research questions that guided this study were: (a) Is there a correlation between practice implementation and the research recommendations related to EBP for ASD by NPDC? (b) How do practitioners choose the best EBP? (c) Based on practitioners' implementation of EBPs, which EBPs become the chosen ones or the "go-to" evidence-based practices for ASD?;The results showed a strong correlation between age and domains in the implementation of EBPs. The practitioners reported using EBPs for domains that showed no research, and research existed for certain EBPs in domains that practitioners are not putting into practice. Educators are choosing EBPs based on the student's needs, but also for other reasons. Practitioners who participated in this study identified their top seven EBPs used in an educational setting. From these results, this should provide a springboard for further studies of EBPs in the educational field.
机译:这项研究的目的是开始弥合自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的循证医学实践(EBP)的当前研究与实践之间的差距。这项研究通过教育领域的专业人员的眼光,考察了ASD的EBP的专业知识方面。它提供了关于自闭症谱系如何与学生一起解释和应用EBP的更多见解;该描述性研究项目基于自闭症谱系疾病国家专业发展中心(ASD上的NPDC)在2007年的工作- 2012年,并通过研究人员创建的调查比较了从实践者那里获得的答案。具体来说,我利用图表显示了按年龄和自闭症领域分类的24个EBP。指导该研究的研究问题是:(a)NPDC的ASD的EBP的实践实施与研究建议之间是否存在相关性? (b)从业者如何选择最佳的EBP? (c)根据从业人员对EBP的实施情况,哪种EBP成为ASD的选择方法或“循证医学”的“首选”实践;结果表明,在实施EBP时年龄和领域之间存在很强的相关性。从业人员报告说,对没有研究的领域使用EBP,并且存在针对从业者未付诸实践的领域中某些EBP的研究。教育工作者正在根据学生的需求选择EBP,但也有其他原因。参加本研究的从业人员确定了他们在教育环境中使用的前7个EBP。从这些结果,这应该为在教育领域进一步研究EBP提供一个跳板。

著录项

  • 作者

    Corbin, Sue Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Special education.;Behavioral psychology.;Educational leadership.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号