首页> 外文学位 >THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE OF TEAMWORK, SATISFACTION, AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE EFFECTIVENESS AMONG PROFESSIONAL HUMAN SERVICE TEAMS.
【24h】

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE OF TEAMWORK, SATISFACTION, AND PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE EFFECTIVENESS AMONG PROFESSIONAL HUMAN SERVICE TEAMS.

机译:专业的人类服务团队之间的团队合作知识,满意度和可感知的绩效效率之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated the relationship between knowledge of teamwork, performance, and satisfaction in members of human service teams. Team Knowledge was conceptualized as encompassing four critical areas: Personal-Interpersonal, Team Environment, Team Leadership, and Team Processing.;A major hypothesis of the present study was that there is a direct relationship between team knowledge and satisfaction, team knowledge and perceived member performance effectiveness, and between satisfaction and perceived member performance effectiveness. The following questions related to team performance, team member satisfaction and teamwork knowledge were investigated: (1) What levels of satisfaction do team members experience in the areas of the work of the team, team leadership and relationships with fellow team members? (2) What relationship exists between teamwork knowledge and effectiveness of team members? (3) What relationship exists between team member performance and satisfaction? (4) What areas of teamwork knowledge are related to effective team performance? (5) What areas of teamwork knowledge are related to team member satisfaction?;Eight human service teams, comprising thirty-eight members, participated in the study. The subjects completed a Team Knowledge Survey, a Team Member Performance Self-Assessment instrument, and the Job Descriptive Index (JDI). Team Leaders completed a Leader Assessment measure of overall Team Performance. The Team Knowledge Survey was designed to measure team member knowledge in the four critical areas. A self-assessment of performance was obtained through the Team Member Performance Self-Assessment. Three of the four JDI scales were employed to measure satisfaction with the work of the team, with team leadership and with other members of the team.;Possible relationships between knowledge and performance, knowledge and satisfaction, and performance and satisfaction were examined through use of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The independent variable was team knowledge and the dependent variables were performance and satisfaction.;Research findings in the literature point to certain general benefits of the team model. Nevertheless, some teams are dysfunctional, which may be reflected in poor performance and low morale or satisfaction. Lack of knowledge about teamwork was identified as a possible contributor to such problems.;Team members were distributed in the middle to moderately high end of the range on knowledge scores; performance scores tended to fall within the middle of the range. There was a tendency for satisfaction scores to be negatively skewed. Members appeared to be relatively more knowledgeable in the Team Environment area.;No statistically significant relationships were found between global knowledge scores, or the subscores in the critical areas of team knowledge, and the performance or satisfaction scores. It was suggested that certain unmeasured moderator variables intervened between the knowledge of individual team members and their performance and satisfaction. Therefore, any relationships among the variables investigated in the present study may be indirect.
机译:这项研究调查了人类服务团队成员的团队合作知识,绩效和满意度之间的关系。团队知识被概念化为涵盖四个关键领域:个人与人际关系,团队环境,团队领导力和团队处理能力。;本研究的主要假设是,团队知识与满意度,团队知识和感知成员之间存在直接关系绩效,以及满意度和感知成员绩效之间的关系。研究了以下与团队绩效,团队成员满意度和团队合作知识有关的问题:(1)团队成员在团队工作,团队领导以及与团队成员之间的关系方面的满意度如何? (2)团队合作知识与团队成员有效性之间存在什么关系? (3)团队成员的绩效与满意度之间存在什么关系? (4)团队合作知识的哪些领域与有效的团队绩效有关? (5)团队合作知识的哪些领域与团队成员的满意度有关?;由38名成员组成的8个人类服务团队参加了研究。受试者完成了团队知识调查,团队成员绩效自我评估工具和工作描述指数(JDI)。团队领导者完成了总体团队绩效的领导者评估。团队知识调查旨在测量四个关键领域中的团队成员知识。通过团队成员绩效自我评估获得了绩效的自我评估。使用四个JDI量表中的三个量表来衡量对团队工作,团队领导以及团队其他成员的满意度;通过使用以下方法检查知识与绩效,知识与满意度以及绩效与满意度之间的可能关系皮尔逊积矩相关系数。自变量是团队知识,因变量是绩效和满意度。文献中的研究结果指出了团队模型的某些一般益处。但是,有些团队运作不正常,这可能表现为表现不佳,士气低落或满意度低。缺乏对团队合作的知识被认为是造成此类问题的可能原因。团队成员分布在知识得分范围的中高端。性能得分往往落在该范围的中间。满意度得分呈负偏向的趋势。成员似乎在团队环境方面的知识更丰富。;在全局知识得分或团队知识的关键领域的子得分与绩效或满意度得分之间未发现统计学上显着的关系。有人建议,某些不可衡量的主持人变量会介入各个团队成员的知识及其绩效和满意度之间。因此,在本研究中研究的变量之间的任何关系都可能是间接的。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Western Michigan University.;

  • 授予单位 Western Michigan University.;
  • 学科 Social psychology.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1981
  • 页码 115 p.
  • 总页数 115
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号