首页> 外文学位 >The influence of rewording and gesture scaffolds on the ability of first graders with low language skill to solve arithmetic word problems.
【24h】

The influence of rewording and gesture scaffolds on the ability of first graders with low language skill to solve arithmetic word problems.

机译:语言改写和手势支架对语言能力低的一年级学生解决算术单词问题的能力的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. This study examined the relationship between arithmetic word problem solving skill in first graders and (1) their oral language skill, (2) their nonverbal understanding of mathematical sets, and (3) rewording and gesture scaffolds designed to help the children access both the linguistic and the nonverbal content of Compare 6 word problems.;Method. Two groups of first graders (15 with good oral language skill and 15 with low oral language skill) solved a matched set of verbal and nonverbal arithmetic problems, followed by three types of Compare word problems. Twenty first graders with low oral language skill (9 with low normal language (LN) and 11 with a diagnosis of language impairment (LI)) then solved orally-presented Compare 6 word problems under 4 scaffold conditions: (1) traditional wording, (2) traditional wording + gesture, (3) rewording, and (4) rewording + gesture.;Results. Children with low oral language skill had greater difficulty solving orally-presented arithmetic word problems than their peers with good language skill, but performed comparably on a nonverbal arithmetic task. Using proportion of problems solved correctly, rewording Compare 6 word problems was facilitative for the LN group but not for the LI group. Changing the problem wording from a Compare 6 to a Compare 3, by using 'more than' instead of 'fewer than' and by eliminating pronoun anaphora, resulted in comparable performance to rewording that also included a rationale, optional verbs and placing the question first. The gesture scaffold was marginally significant for both groups.;Conclusions. The LI group did not benefit from implicitly-presented rewording or gesture scaffolds; the LN group did benefit from the rewording scaffold. The gesture scaffold was marginally facilitative despite the finding that children with low oral language skill were able to access nonverbal information in a nonverbal arithmetic task. Empirical and anecdotal evidence suggested that, for a number of these children, rewording and gesture scaffolds altered their mental model of the word problem structure. This altered representation resulted in the use of different solution strategies. The new strategies, however, were not always correct. Implications for classroom intervention and suggestions for future research are discussed.
机译:目的。这项研究检查了一年级学生的算术单词解题能力与(1)他们的口语表达能力,(2)他们对数学集的非语言理解以及(3)旨在帮助孩子学习两种语言的改写词和手势支架之间的关系。以及比较6个单词问题的非语言内容。两组一年级学生(15名具有良好的口语能力,而15名具有较低的口语能力)解决了一组匹配的语言和非语言算术问题,然后是三种比较单词问题。 20名口语水平较低的一年级生(9名语言水平较低(LN),11名语言障碍诊断(LI))然后解决了在4个支架条件下的口头比较6个单词问题:(1)传统措辞,( 2)传统措辞+手势,(3)重新措辞,以及(4)重新措辞+手势。口语能力低的孩子比口语能力强的同伴要解决口头表达的算术单词问题困难更大,但在非语言算术任务上的表现却相当。使用正确解决的问题比例,重新措词比较6个单词的问题对LN组有利,对LI组则不然。通过使用“大于”而不是“少于”,并消除代词照应,将问题措辞从“比较6”更改为“比较3”,从而产生了与重新措词相当的性能,该措辞还包括基本原理,可选动词并将问题放在首位。手势支架对两组均无统计学意义。 LI组没有从隐式呈现的重新措辞或手势支架中受益; LN组确实从改写支架中受益。尽管发现口语能力低的儿童能够在非语言算术任务中访问非语言信息,但手势支架在边缘上却起到了促进作用。经验和轶事证据表明,对于这些儿童中的许多人来说,改写单词和打手势脚手架改变了他们对单词问题结构的心理模型。这种表示方式的改变导致使用了不同的解决方案策略。但是,新策略并不总是正确的。讨论了课堂干预的含义和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Samelson, Vicki Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.;Health Sciences Speech Pathology.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号