首页> 外文学位 >Rorschach responses in gifted and nongifted children: A comparison study.
【24h】

Rorschach responses in gifted and nongifted children: A comparison study.

机译:有天赋和无天赋儿童的罗夏反应:一项比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Statement of the problem. School psychologists frequently administer the Rorschach Inkblot Test to gain insight into emotional functioning of children. It is important that clinicians understand how intelligence factors affect Rorschach performance to avoid the error of attributing to personality results that may be related to intelligence. One issue yet to be resolved is whether intellectually gifted children give responses that are different from normative data. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to compare Rorschach responses of gifted and nongifted children.; Method. The sample included 60 students (Grades 4-5) in five public elementary schools consisting of 30 students participating in a gifted and talented program, and 30 students with Composite Cognitive Abilities scores between 90-109. The study employed the Rorschach Inkblot Test individually administered by three examiners, according to the Exner Comprehensive Method. Between group comparisons, as well as comparisons to normative data were made for seven dependent variables: Lambda, Erlebnistypus (EB), Schizophrenia Index (SCZI), total number of Responses (R), Populars (P), unusual detail (Dd) responses, and total number of blends.; Results. Parametric and non-parametric analyzes were completed as appropriate. Significant group differences were evidenced for three of the seven variables: Lambda {dollar}(t = 3.86, p < .001),{dollar} EB {dollar}(chisp2 = 6.13, p < .05),{dollar} and number of blends {dollar}(t = 3.99, p < .001).{dollar} Although SCZI Index mean score comparisons between gifted and nongifted groups were similar, 50% of the gifted and 33% of the nongifted samples earned significant SCZI Index scores ranging from 4-6. A comparison of descriptive data for dependent variables to normative data (10-11 year), indicates wide disparity.; Conclusions. Findings, in part, support the original research questions. Intelligence level in children appears to affect Rorschach responses. Data suggest that nongifted children offer more responses based on pure form and gifted children offer more responses involving more than one determinant. The most prevalent Coping style (EB) for both groups is Ambitent. Data raise questions related to the validity of the SCZI Index when applied to children. This study also raises questions related to the use of Rorschach Comprehensive System normative data for interpretative comparisons.
机译:问题陈述。学校心理学家经常进行罗夏墨迹测验,以深入了解儿童的情绪功能。重要的是,临床医生必须了解智力因素如何影响Rorschach的表现,避免归因于可能与智力有关的性格结果错误。一个有待解决的问题是有天赋的孩子是否做出与规范数据不同的回答。因此,本研究的目的是比较有天赋和无天赋的孩子对罗夏的反应。方法。样本包括五所公立小学的60名学生(4-5年级),其中包括30名参加有才华和才华的计划的学生,以及30名综合认知能力得分在90-109之间的学生。根据Exner综合方法,该研究采用了由三名检查员分别进行的罗夏墨迹测验。在小组比较之间以及与规范数据的比较之间进行了七个因变量:Lambda,Erlebnistypus(EB),精神分裂症指数(SCZI),响应总数(R),Populars(P),异常​​细节(Dd)响应,以及混合总数。结果。适当地完成了参数和非参数分析。在七个变量中的三个变量上,存在明显的群体差异:Lambda {美元}(t = 3.86,p <.001),{dollar} EB {dollar}(chisp2 = 6.13,p <.05),{dollar}和数字的混合{美元}(t = 3.99,p <.001)。{dollar}尽管SCZI指数在有天赋和无赠物组之间的平均得分比较相似,但50%的有天赋的样本和33%的无赠物样本的SCZI指数得分显着4-6。将因变量的描述性数据与规范性数据(10-11年)进行比较,表明差异很大。结论研究结果部分支持原始的研究问题。儿童的智力水平似乎会影响罗夏的反应。数据表明,没有天赋的孩子会提供更多基于纯形式的响应,有天赋的孩子会提供更多涉及多个决定因素的响应。两组最普遍的应对方式(EB)是“雄心勃勃”。当应用于儿童时,数据引起了与SCZI指数有效性的问题。这项研究还提出了与使用Rorschach综合系​​统规范性数据进行解释性比较有关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号