首页> 外文学位 >Assessing writing instruction in a sophomore engineering course: Iterations of integrating writing from 1995--1999.
【24h】

Assessing writing instruction in a sophomore engineering course: Iterations of integrating writing from 1995--1999.

机译:在大二工程课程中评估写作指导:1995--1999年的整合写作迭代。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project presents the data gathered in a study of the writing instruction provided by the Writing Center in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at the University of South Carolina. I examine the history of the ECE Writing Center and its four-year relationship with a sophomore lab course, EECE 201. The ECE Writing Center was established to integrate writing instruction into the 201 lab course as an ECE Departmental attempt to address one of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditation goals, demonstrating integration of communications and writing instruction into the existing curriculum. Since 1995, the ECE Writing Center has used several different methods of introducing writing instruction into the 201 course. These methods include voluntary writing groups, mandatory groups, studio groups, individual consultations, and hiring a technical writing teaching assistant to grade the writing portion of lab reports. In the spring 1999 semester, the Writing Center staff provided the writing instruction in the course and graded the writing content of the lab reports.; My dissertation contains the information I gathered from student interviews and surveys, writing center documents and presentations, and my observation journal. In addition, I analyzed student lab reports for specific writing characteristics to demonstrate a connection between Writing Center instruction and improvement in student writing. These characteristics are: purpose statements in abstracts; introduction of tables and graphs with sentences or phrases to give the readers context for the data; use of subheadings; and provision of sentences of analysis and explanation for discrepancies in data that occurred in the lab. By analyzing this data in the context of Writing in the Disciplines (WID) and Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) theory, I drew conclusions about the success of the ECE Departments Writing in the Disciplines effort. This work builds on the previous dissertation by Kristin Walker, Assessing Students' Genre Knowledge in an Engineering Writing Center: An Analysis of Sophomore Lab Reports in Electrical and Computer Engineering, published in 1997.
机译:该项目展示了在对南卡罗来纳大学电气与计算机工程(ECE)系写作中心提供的写作指导研究中收集的数据。我检查了ECE写作中心的历史及其与二年级实验课程EECE 201的四年关系。ECE写作中心的建立是为了将写作指导整合到201实验室课程中,这是ECE部门试图解决其中一项认证的尝试工程技术委员会(ABET)的认证目标,表明了交流的集成并将指令编写到现有课程中。自1995年以来,欧洲经委会写作中心已采用几种不同的方法将写作指导引入201课程。这些方法包括自愿写作小组,强制性小组,工作室小组,个人咨询,以及聘请技术写作教学助手来对实验室报告的写作部分进行评分。在1999年春季学期,写作中心的工作人员在课程中提供了写作指导,并对实验室报告的写作内容进行了评分。我的论文包含我从学生访谈和调查,撰写中心文件和演示文稿以及我的观察日志中收集的信息。此外,我分析了学生实验室报告中的特定写作特征,以证明写作中心的指导与学生写作水平的提高之间的联系。这些特征是:摘要中的目的陈述;引入带有句子或短语的表格和图表,为读者提供数据的上下文;小标题的使用;并提供分析和解释语句,以解决实验室中发生的数据差异。通过在“学科写作”(WID)和“跨课程写作”(WAC)理论的背景下分析这些数据,我得出了有关ECE学科写作工作取得成功的结论。这项工作是在克里斯汀·沃克(Kristin Walker)先前的论文的基础上进行的,该论文是在工程写作中心评估学生的体裁知识:《电气和计算机工程专业二年级实验室报告分析》,于1997年出版。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramey, Deanna Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Engineering General.; Language Rhetoric and Composition.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 192 p.
  • 总页数 192
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工程基础科学;语言学;教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号