首页> 外文学位 >A study of multi-models of school education quality from organizational perspectives.
【24h】

A study of multi-models of school education quality from organizational perspectives.

机译:从组织角度研究学校教育质量的多种模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to construct a framework of management approaches for the pursuance of school quality in the context of primary schools in Hong Kong. The framework comprises a model of school education quality which contains five dimensions, and four management approaches. In the literature review, the conceptualization of school education quality is based upon research on organizational effectiveness (Cameron & Whetten, 1983) and school effectiveness (Cheng, 1990, 1996; Cheng & Tam, 1997), that there are five dimensions to school education quality, namely, quality in goal achievement, quality in satisfaction, quality in smooth process, quality in problem prevention, quality in continuous learning. The conceptualization of management approaches is based upon the multiple perspectives of organization proposed by Sergiovanni (1984), Bush (1986), Bolman and Deal (1991), and Cheng (1997), that school organization can be perceived from four perspectives, namely, structural, human resource, political, and cultural. Finally, teacher performance measures such as teaching efficacy and teaching commitment, student performance measures such as lean-ling attitude, learning efficacy, and self concept have been employed to test the authenticity of the present framework.;In the multi-level analysis of teacher performance, it was found that quality in continuous learning contributed to the prediction of teacher efficacy, and all five dimensions of school education quality contributed to the prediction of teacher commitment. Moreover, human strength, political strength, and cultural strength contributed to the prediction of teacher commitment. Multi-level analysis of student performance revealed that quality in satisfaction contributed to the prediction of the attibution to success component of learning efficacy, quality in satisfaction interacts with gender contributed to the prediction of personal learning efficacy and the combined learning efficacy. Moreover, political strength contributed to the prediction of self-concept towards peer. Also, there were main effects, some interaction, and some effects in the random part of the model. This shows that the contributions of school education quality and management strengths to teacher and student performance are complicated and subtle.;The above findings did confirm the close relation between management strengths and the quality dimensions, and supported the claim that both the quality dimensions and management strengths were valid predictors of teacher and student performance. The results also implied that schools should adopt the management approaches in order to improve school education quality.;In-depth case study of three outlier schools revealed that the four management approaches did contribute to the five dimensions of school education quality. It also revealed that the exertion of management strengths might not be the only factor which brings about school quality. It was discovered that the contextual factors of the school, such as the existence of implicit goals, ethos of the school in the community, experience of the senior teachers, etc., had all played important roles in enabling a school to achieve school quality. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:这项研究的目的是建立一个管理方法框架,以在香港小学背景下追求学校质量。该框架包括一个学校教育质量模型,该模型包含五个维度和四种管理方法。在文献综述中,学校教育质量的概念化基于对组织有效性(Cameron&Whetten,1983)和学校有效性(Cheng,1990,1996; Cheng&Tam,1997)的研究,即学校教育有五个维度质量,即目标达成的质量,满意度的质量,平稳过程的质量,问题预防的质量,持续学习的质量。管理方法的概念化是基于Sergiovanni(1984),Bush(1986),Bolman and Deal(1991)和Cheng(1997)提出的组织的多种视角,可以从四个视角来理解学校组织,即:结构,人力资源,政治和文化。最后,采用教师绩效指标(如教学效能和教学承诺),学生绩效指标(如精干态度,学习效能和自我概念)来检验本框架的真实性。绩效,发现持续学习的质量有助于教师效能的预测,而学校教育质量的所有五个方面都有助于教师承诺的预测。此外,人的力量,政治力量和文化力量也有助于预测教师的承诺。对学生成绩的多层次分析表明,满意度的质量有助于预测成功的学习效果的构成要素,满意度的质量与性别有关,有助于预测个人学习效果和综合学习效果。此外,政治实力有助于对同伴的自我概念的预测。此外,模型的随机部分还具有主要作用,一些相互作用和一些作用。这表明学校教育质量和管理力量对师生的贡献是复杂而微妙的。上面的发现确实证实了管理力量和质量维度之间的密切关系,并支持了质量维度和管理两者的说法。优势是教师和学生表现的有效预测指标。研究结果还暗示,学校应该采用管理方法来提高学校教育质量。对三个偏远学校的深入案例研究表明,四种管理方法确实有助于学校教育质量的五个方面。这也表明,发挥管理力量可能不是提高学校质量的唯一因素。人们发现,学校的环境因素,例如隐性目标的存在,社区中学校的风气,高级教师的经验等,都在使学校达到学校质量方面发挥了重要作用。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tam, Frank Wai-Ming.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号