首页> 外文学位 >Naturalizing intentionality.
【24h】

Naturalizing intentionality.

机译:归纳意向。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The thesis of this essay is that the prospects for finding a reductive physicalist account of intentional mental states are bleak. I reach this conclusion by a critical examination of what would appear to be the viable options for such a theory. These options may be classified as follows.;First, there is a family of theories which aims to explicate intentional phenomena along causal lines either by reducing the intentional connection to that of reliable causal covariation or by equating historical chains of denotation to causal chains of linguistic utterances. A second class of theories uses evolutionary theory to identify the intentional content of mental states with the (putative) biological functions of such states. A third theoretical category encompasses positions which equate intentional content with the conceptual/syntactical role of linguaform mental tokens. Theories within the first category founder as a result of either (1) their incapacity to dissociate meaning from information or (2) their insufficiently reductive account of the act of denotation. Theories within the second group fail as a result of their presumption that selectionism. can be extended distributively to contentful mental states. Deeper doubts as to the adequacy of such theories are raised by a more comprehensive critique of selectionism. Conceptual/syntactical theories are encumbered by their inability to explain why intentional content is a necessary postulate of psychology. Such theories are, as a result, essentially eliminativist in character and fail to account adequately for the explanandum.;The failure of reductive theories gives rise to a nonreductive physicalism. This position is not consistent, however, as it cannot be reconciled with the fact that complex entities cannot be causes both per se and in virtue of their underlying microstructures. I suggest that a pluralistic ontology offers the best prospects for an adequate account of intentional states, an account capable of accomodating the distinctive features of intentional phenomena.
机译:本文的论点是,寻找有意识的心理状态的还原性物理学家观点的前景黯淡。通过对这种理论似乎可行的选择进行严格审查,我得出了这个结论。这些选项可以分类如下:首先,有一系列理论旨在通过减少因果关系与可靠因果协变的意图联系,或者通过将历史表示法与语言因果关系等同,来沿因果关系阐明意图现象。话语。第二类理论使用进化论来确定具有这些状态的(假定的)生物学功能的精神状态的故意内容。第三类理论包括将意向内容等同于语言心理标记的概念/句法作用的位置。第一类创建者中的理论是由于(1)无法将信息与意义分离开来,或者(2)对表示行为的还原性描述不足。第二类中的理论由于推定选择主义而失败。可以分布式地扩展到充实的精神状态。通过对选择主义的更全面的批评,人们对这种理论的适用性提出了更深层次的怀疑。概念/句法理论由于无法解释为什么故意内容是心理学的必要假设而受到困扰。结果,这样的理论本质上是消极主义的,并且不能对解释作出充分的解释。归纳理论的失败导致了非归纳物理主义。但是,这种立场并不一致,因为它不能与复杂的实体本身及其潜在的微观结构既不能引起原因这一事实相吻合。我建议,多元本体论为充分说明故意状态提供了最好的前景,这种说明能够容纳故意现象的独特特征。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gottlieb, Mark.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Psychology Cognitive.;Language Linguistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号