首页> 外文学位 >Increasing quality and equity in education: The case of Chile.
【24h】

Increasing quality and equity in education: The case of Chile.

机译:提高教育质量和公平性:智利为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the most important questions confronting education policy makers is whether the efficiency of the education system could be improved by introducing some degree of competition into the supply of education services. Friedman (1955) argued that private schools are inherently more efficient than publicly operated schools, and advocated a competitive system of publicly funded student vouchers with the expectation that parents choice will favor private schools and public schools will have to compete by increasing quality.; As many other countries in Latin America, Chile's ongoing education reform (that started in the early eighties) is aimed at improving the quality and equity of education in the public sector. In its desire to improve quality by reducing inefficiencies derived from the bureaucratic nature of the central government administration, it decentralized the education administration by transferring school management from the central government to the municipalities. Additionally, it established a voucher program similar in spirit to Fiedman's "ideal" system. In particular, under the Chilean system parents can send their children to public schools, or to private schools that agree to take a voucher as full payment for the cost of education.; The legacy of the reform is a tripartite education system, consisting of municipal schools which receive central government financing (subvention) and are administered by municipalities, private schools which receive the same central government subsidy and are administered privately, and privately financed, privately managed schools. The share of enrollment in the third type of schools has remained around 8--10%, while the share of public school enrollment shrunk with the implementation of the voucher-type program from around 90% to 65% in the late 90's. Most of the students that moved out of the public schools and into the new private schools came from less disadvantaged areas, leaving the public schools with a higher proportion of the students that are most difficult to educate.; Chile constitutes and excellent case of analysis because of this policy experience in a context of universal primary and secondary education. In addition school tests have become a standard practice. Good disaggregated data by schools on test results and characteristics of establishments is available and periodic household surveys allow the identification of family characteristics of the students.; The study undertaken by this researcher is based on disaggregated data and incorporates the use of frontier econometric methodologies to avoid or at least, diminished statistical biases. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:教育政策制定者面临的最重要问题之一是,通过在教育服务的提供中引入一定程度的竞争,是否可以提高教育系统的效率。弗里德曼(Friedman,1955)认为私立学校在本质上比公立学校更有效率,并提倡竞争性的公立学生券制度,期望父母的选择将有利于私立学校,而公立学校则必须通过提高质量来竞争。与拉丁美洲许多其他国家一样,智利正在进行的教育改革(始于八十年代初)旨在提高公共部门教育的质量和公平性。为了减少因中央政府行政机构的官僚主义而造成的效率低下,提高质量,它通过将学校管理从中央政府转移到市政当局来分散教育管理的权力。此外,它建立了与Fiedman的“理想”系统类似的凭证计划。特别是,在智利的制度下,父母可以将子女送到公立学校或私立学校,后者同意接受代金券作为教育费用的全额付款。改革的遗产是一个三方教育体系,包括接受中央政府资助(补贴)并由市政府管理的市政学校,获得相同中央政府补贴并由私立和私立私人管理的私立学校组成的私立学校。第三类学校的入学率一直保持在8--10%左右,而随着凭证式计划的实施,公立学校的入学率从90%左右下降到90年代末的65%。离开公立学校并进入新的私立学校的大多数学生来自处境较弱的地区,而公立学校中最难教育的学生比例更高。智利是分析的极好案例,因为在普及初等和中等教育的背景下,这种政策经验使智利成为分析的极好案例。此外,学校考试已成为标准做法。学校可以获得关于测试结果和机构特征的良好分类数据,并且定期进行家庭调查可以确定学生的家庭特征。该研究人员进行的研究基于分类数据,并结合了前沿计量经济学方法的使用,以避免或至少减少了统计偏差。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Tokman, Andrea Paula.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 81 p.
  • 总页数 81
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号