首页> 外文学位 >Individual learning versus cooperative learning in a university spreadsheet applications class.
【24h】

Individual learning versus cooperative learning in a university spreadsheet applications class.

机译:大学电子表格应用程序课程中的个人学习与合作学习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated whether individual learners or cooperative learners perform more effectively and efficiently in a university spreadsheet applications class.;Even though there is documented evidence that cooperative learning may produce positive results across a wide range of students and curriculums, there is little research documenting cooperative learning at the college level (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991b). Further, there was no research documenting cooperative learning with spreadsheet applications with university or college students.;The major questions the study sought to answer were four research hypotheses: (1) There is a difference in individual learners and cooperative learners performances, (2) there is a difference in the teacher assistance time required for individual learners and cooperative learners, (3) there is a difference in the computer time required to complete assignments for individual learners and cooperative learners, and (4) there is a difference in the documentation study time used by individual learners and cooperative learners.;This study used a design that compared the posttest and self-reported data of an experimental group, which used a cooperative learning method to learn spreadsheet applications, with the data for the control group, which used an individualized method to learn spreadsheet applications. The treatment was randomly assigned to intact classes. The SAM test was used for the performance measurement. There was significant difference between the experimental section and the control section for student time spent on the computer completing assignments. The cooperative group of students spent less time on the computer.;The results of this study suggest one can expect a cooperative learning approach will reduce students, time on the computer compared to traditional individual focused classes. This is consistent with Olivas' (1991) results.
机译:这项研究调查了个人学习者还是合作学习者在大学电子表格应用程序班级中的表现是否更有效。;尽管有文献表明合作学习可以在广泛的学生和课程中产生积极的结果,但很少有研究记录合作学习在大学一级学习(Johnson,Johnson和Smith,1991b)。此外,还没有研究记录大学生或大学生使用电子表格应用进行合作学习的研究。;该研究试图回答的主要问题是四个研究假设:(1)个人学习者和合作学习者的表现有所不同,(2)个人学习者和合作学习者所需的老师协助时间有所不同;(3)个人学习者和合作学习者完成作业所需的计算机时间有所不同;(4)文档的存在差异研究个人学习者和合作学习者使用的时间。这项研究使用了一种设计,该设计比较了实验组的后测数据和自我报告的数据,该实验组使用了合作学习方法来学习电子表格应用程序,并与对照组的数据进行了比较。使用了个性化的方法来学习电子表格应用程序。治疗被随机分配到完整的类别。 SAM测试用于性能测量。在实验部分和控制部分之间,学生在计算机上完成作业所花费的时间存在显着差异。合作小组的学生在计算机上花费的时间更少。这项研究的结果表明,与传统的个人重点班级相比,合作学习方法将减少学生在计算机上的时间。这与Olivas(1991)的结果是一致的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wicklund, Diane Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Business education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 101 p.
  • 总页数 101
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号