首页> 外文学位 >On 'loving the neighbor': The implications of Emmanuel Levinas' intensification of ethics after the Shoah.
【24h】

On 'loving the neighbor': The implications of Emmanuel Levinas' intensification of ethics after the Shoah.

机译:关于“爱邻居”:伊万纽·列维纳斯在大屠杀之后强化道德的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My thesis examines the ethic of heteronomy put forth by twentieth century Franco-Jewish thinker, Emmanuel Levinas. I focus specifically on the Jewish particularity of his ethic, which responds to the human genocide of the twentieth century, specifically, the Shoah. I locate what Levinas says of this ethic in relation to significant twentieth century responses to the philosophical discourse on the death of God. These include Sigmund Freud's suspicion concerning the viability of a universal ethic in the face of anti-Semitism and his concern with "the Jewish question" in Civilization and its Discontents ; the disavowal of religion and moral nihilism of the post-Hegelian, post-Christian tradition in which I locate Jacques Lacan and the Heideggerian resonances in Seminar VII: An Ethics of Psychoanalysis which erase the significance of "the Jewish question"; the "disdainful spiritualism" that Levinas attributes to Martin Buber's I and Thou, and the latter's onto-theological response to the death of God; and finally, Paul Ricoeur's critique of Levinas which is anticipated by Buber's question: is there not also an ethic toward oneself? The point of convergence for each of these thinkers with Levinas is the imperative of loving the neighbor which, in its response to the crisis of modernity (which I refer to in terms of the Shoah as a historical manifestation of "the death of God") aims to redefine the confluence of philosophy, ethics and religion in a postmodern era. In doing this, I show how Levinas' response to the Shoah not only intensifies the need for ethics and a return to religion beyond faith and the bounds of mere reason, but also points toward a vision of social justice in his view of Messianism which embraces the global community. I also speak to the implications of the Levinasian ethic which are significant to the continuity of Jewish identity in the Diaspora, religious pluralism, the issue of rights and responsibilities and a global ethic addressed at the World Parliament of Religions and a rapprochement between Jews and Christians after Auschwitz.
机译:我的论文研究了二十世纪法裔犹太思想家伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)提出的异质性伦理。我特别关注犹太人的道德特质,这种道德特质是对二十世纪人类种族灭绝(特别是Shoah)的回应。我发现列维纳斯对这种道德的看法与20世纪对上帝之死的哲学论述的重大反应有关。其中包括西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)对面对反犹太主义的普遍伦理的可行性的怀疑,以及他对《文明》及其不满中“犹太人问题”的关注;否定了后黑格尔,后基督教传统的宗教和道德虚无主义,我在该研讨会中找到了雅克·拉康和海德格尔的共鸣:《精神分析伦理学》消除了“犹太人问题”的重要性;列维纳斯将“卑鄙的精神主义”归因于马丁·布伯的《我与你》,以及后者对神之死的本体论回应。最后,是保罗·里科(Paul Ricoeur)对列维纳斯(Levinas)的批评,这是布伯的问题所预料到的:对自己的道德观念是否还存在?这些思想家与列维那斯的融合点是当务之急是爱护邻居,这是邻居回应现代危机(我指的是沙阿语中“上帝之死”的历史表现)目的是在后现代时代重新定义哲学,伦理学和宗教的融合。在这样做的过程中,我展示了列维纳斯对大屠杀的回应,不仅加剧了对道德的需​​求,并超越了信仰和纯粹理性的界限而重返宗教,而且在他的弥赛亚主义观点中指出了社会正义的愿景。全球社区。我还谈到了列维纳斯伦理学的影响,这些影响对于散居犹太人的犹太人身份的延续,宗教多元化,权利和责任的问题以及在世界宗教议会上讨论的全球伦理学以及犹太人和基督徒之间的和解具有重要意义。在奥斯威辛集中营之后。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pontoriero, Eleanor.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 271 p.
  • 总页数 271
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教理论、宗教思想;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号