首页> 外文学位 >Topics in the syntax of East Asian languages: Long-distance anaphora and adverbial case (Korean, Chinese, Japanese).
【24h】

Topics in the syntax of East Asian languages: Long-distance anaphora and adverbial case (Korean, Chinese, Japanese).

机译:东亚语言语法主题:远距离回指和副词(韩语,中文,日语)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation aims at giving a unified account of long-distance anaphora in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese, and providing a principled account of structural Case on adverbial DPs in Korean in the Minimalist framework.; Considering that the LD reflexives in these Asian languages behave differently from those in such European languages as Italian and Icelandic, Chapter 2 discusses LD anaphora in these Asian languages, taking Cole & Sung's (1994) Head Movement Analysis. Chapter 3 discusses this topic in the Minimalist framework, positing the feature [Refl] for LD reflexives and the functional category T.; I show that LD anaphora in these Asian languages has to do with whether the LD reflexives have inherent &phis;-features. I show that weak subject orientation for the Korean LD reflexives and strong subject orientation for the Chinese and Japanese counterparts follow from the account of Subject Orientation, whose Condition (C) excludes an object from being an antecedent for the Chinese and Japanese LD anaphors with no inherent &phis;-features. I prove that the blocking effect for Chinese ziji follows from LF Spec-head agreement, that the absence of the blocking effect for zibun follows from optional agreement for Japanese, and that the absence of the blocking effect for the Korean LD anaphors is due to their inherent &phis;-features.; The gist of the analysis of Adverbial Case in Korean is that the duration adverbial gets its Accusative feature checked by Aspect and that the frequency adverbial gets its Accusative or Nominative feature checked off by v or T. This explains why the frequency adverbial shows the same Case as the verbal object, and why the duration adverbial behaves differently from the frequency adverbial and the verbal object.; I argue that no Aspect exists for the stative/psych verbs, that unergative verbs are verbs with capacity to license Accusative Case, and that no light verb exists for unaccusative verbs with no capacity to license Accusative Case.; In case Aspect for the embedded VP has a value [0 complete] in the siph-ta construction, the durative, the frequency adverbial, and the verbal object have their Nominative features checked by the matrix T.
机译:本文旨在对韩语,中文和日语的长距离照应进行统一描述,并在极简主义框架下对韩语副词DP的结构性案例进行原则性阐述。考虑到这些亚洲语言中的LD反身词与意大利和冰岛等欧洲语言中的LD反身词有不同的表现,因此,第二章采用Cole&Sung(1994)的头部运动分析,讨论了这些亚洲语言中的LD照应。第3章在“极简主义”框架中讨论了该主题,并假设了LD自反句的功能[Refl]和功能类别T。我证明了这些亚洲语言中的LD照应与LD反身语是否具有固有的φ特征有关。我发现朝鲜语LD自反语的主题取向很弱,而中国和日本语同位语的主题取向很强,这是因为主题取向的原因,其条件(C)排除了一个对象成为中国和日本LD照应的前提,没有固有的功能。我证明了中文 ziji 的阻止效果来自LF Spec-head协议,没有 zibun 的阻止效果来自于日语的可选协议,并且对朝鲜语LD照应没有阻碍作用是由于其固有的φ特性。朝鲜语副词格分析的要点在于,持续时间副词通过Aspect检验其宾格特征,频度副词通过v或T对其宾格或主格特征进行检查。这解释了频数副词为何显示同一格的原因。作为言语宾语,以及为什么持续时间状语的表现与频率状语和言语宾语不同。我认为,动词/心理动词不存在“方面”,非格动词是具有许可宾格能力的动词,无宾语动词不具有轻语动词但不具有许可格的能力。如果嵌入式VP的Aspect在 siph-ta 构造中的值为[0 complete],则持续性,频率副词和言语对象的名词性特征将通过矩阵T进行检查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sohng, Hong Ki.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.; Language Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 255 p.
  • 总页数 255
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号