首页> 外文学位 >The relationship between efficacy, teamwork, effort and patient satisfaction.
【24h】

The relationship between efficacy, teamwork, effort and patient satisfaction.

机译:效能,团队合作,努力和患者满意度之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A key issue for hospital patient care teams is that how well they function impacts many the care giving process. A few of the known problems with health care teams are the duplication of effort, insufficient use of multidisciplinary teams to deliver care, and fragmentation in care delivery processes (CQHCA, 2001). A teamwork assessment tool may help to predict team development needs more accurately especially when linked with self and collective efficacy, and individual and collective effort.; This purpose of this study was to explore the influence of self and collective-efficacy, teamwork, and individual and collective effort on patient satisfaction. An additional purpose was to provide reliability and validity information on a composite of measurement instruments. In Study 1, 149 registered nurses completed the Health Care Teams Questionnaire from a Childrens Hospital in Southern Australia. In Study 2, 123 individuals comprising 28 teams completed the Health Care Teams Questionnaire from a Childrens Hospital in Southern California.; The results for both Study 1 and the Study 2 showed that self and collective efficacy, teamwork skills and individual and collective effort were all significantly positively related. Study 2 showed that there were no significant differences amongst and between units for patient satisfaction with care, self and collective efficacy, teamwork and individual and collective effort. Differences were found however by shift. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between dayshift and night shift in self-efficacy and teamwork relationships between patient satisfaction and self-efficacy and patient satisfaction and teamwork skills.; There are several implications for practice. First, highly performing patient care teams are essential to have positive patient care outcomes (COQHC, 2001). Second, nurses are limited resource and staff must perform to their full scope with a moderate amount role overlap between other care providers e.g. Licensed Vocational Nurse or Patient Care Service Aide (Dreachslin et al., 1999). Third, poorly functioning health teams are a liability to consumers of healthcare and organizations. The Healthcare Teams Questionnaire provides a inclusive set of measures that is cost effective and increases the ability accurately assess team development needs (Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2000).
机译:对于医院患者护理团队来说,一个关键问题是,它们的功能如何会影响许多护理过程。卫生保健团队的一些已知问题是重复工作,没有足够的多学科团队来提供医疗服务以及医疗服务流程分散(CQHCA,2001)。团队合作评估工具可能有助于更准确地预测团队发展需求,尤其是与自我和集体效能以及个人和集体努力联系在一起时。这项研究的目的是探讨自我和集体效能,团队合作以及个人和集体努力对患者满意度的影响。另一个目的是提供有关多种测量仪器的可靠性和有效性信息。在研究1中,149名注册护士完成了南澳大利亚州一家儿童医院的医疗队问卷。在研究2中,由28个小组组成的123个人完成了南加利福尼亚州一家儿童医院的《健康护理小组问卷》。研究1和研究2的结果均表明,自我和集体效能,团队合作技能以及个人和集体努力均显着正相关。研究2表明,各单位之间以及各单位之间在患者对护理的满意度,自我和集体效能,团队合作以及个人和集体努力方面没有显着差异。但是通过轮班发现差异。方差分析显示,白天和夜间轮班的自我效能感和患者满意度与自我效能感,患者满意度和团队合作能力之间的团队关系存在显着差异。对于实践有几个含义。首先,高效的患者护理团队对于取得积极的患者护理结果至关重要(COQHC,2001)。其次,护士资源有限,员工必须充分发挥作用,而其他护理提供者之间的角色重叠则适中。获得许可的职业护士或病人护理服务助手(Dreachslin等,1999)。第三,运作不佳的医疗团队是医疗保健和组织消费者的责任。 《医疗团队问卷》提供了一套全面的措施,这些措施具有成本效益,并能提高准确评估团队发展需求的能力(Salas&Cannon-Bowers,2000)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marshall, Lori Carmel.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Psychology Industrial.; Health Sciences Health Care Management.; Health Sciences Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业心理学;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号