首页> 外文会议>World Congress of Total Intravenous Anaesthesia >Sedation with TCI-propofol and remifentanil versus TCt-remifentanil for short orthopedic procedures. Patients and surgeons satisfaction.
【24h】

Sedation with TCI-propofol and remifentanil versus TCt-remifentanil for short orthopedic procedures. Patients and surgeons satisfaction.

机译:镇静与TCI-Faphofol和Remifentanil对TCT-Remifentanil进行短整形外科手术。患者和外科医生满意。

获取原文

摘要

Background The aim of this prospective study was to compare two methods of sedation using target-controlled infusion (TCI) for short and less painful orthopedic procedures. Patients and method After written informed consent, 40 patients, ASA I-II, scheduled for osteosyn-thesis material removal from the ankle under local anesthesia were randomized into 2 groups: group PR received TCI propofol (Schneider) c_(p=)1.7 mug/ml and remifentanil 0.1 mug/kg/min in continuous infusion, and group R, received TCI remifentanil c_(p=) 2ng/ml. Sedation was assessed using Modified Wilson sedation scale at 5 minutes intervals during the procedure. Recovery times, pain (VAS), surgeon's satisfaction at the end of the procedure using a three level scale, patient's satisfaction at 24 hours postoperatively (IOWA Satisfaction Scale) and other side-effects were also recorded.
机译:背景技术这项前瞻性研究的目的是使用目标控制的输注(TCI)进行比较两种镇静方法,以便短,较少的痛苦的整形外科手术。患者和方法在书面知情同意后,40名患者,ASA I-II患者,局部麻醉下从踝关节中移除局部麻醉后的物质被随机分为2组:组PR接受TCI异丙酚(施耐德)C_(P =)1.7杯子/ ml和雷芬丹尼尼0.1 mug / kg / min在连续输注中,r组接受TCI雷芬胺C_(P =)2ng / ml。在该程序期间,使用改性的威尔逊镇静标度评估镇静。恢复时间,疼痛(VAS),外科医生在使用三级规模的程序结束时的满意度,患者术后24小时的患者满意(爱荷华州满意度规模)和其他副作用也被记录出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号