首页> 外文学位 >The validity and reliability of the ninth grade direct writing assessment: Determining its effectiveness in measuring English language learner student proficiency.
【24h】

The validity and reliability of the ninth grade direct writing assessment: Determining its effectiveness in measuring English language learner student proficiency.

机译:九年级直接写作评估的有效性和可靠性:确定其在测量英语学习者学生熟练程度方面的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many national reports indicate that more attention needs to be placed on writing and the teaching of writing in schools. The purpose of this quantitative study was to, first, examine the structure of the DWA and, second, to use the scores from the DWA to examine the relationship between ELL status and writing proficiency.;Five major research questions were addressed: (1) Does the DWA provide valid and reliable scores of writing proficiency for students in general and for specific groups of students based on ELL status and ethnicity? (2) What is the relation between ELL status and writing proficiency for ninth-grade students attending public schools in Utah during the years 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, and to what extent do student variables, such as gender, social economic status, and ethnicity, independently and cumulatively explain the relationship? (3) To what extent do the school variables, percent of low-income students in a school, percent of minority students in a school, size of the school, and mean ELL status at a school independently and cumulatively explain the relation between ELL status and writing proficiency? (4) To what extent do the district variables, percent low-income students in a district, percent minority students in a district, size of the district, mean ELL status in a district, and whether a district is urban or rural independently and cumulatively explain the relation between ELL status and writing proficiency? (5) To what extent does the relationship between ELL status and writing proficiency interact with ethnicity?;The results of the study indicated that the DWA was a valid and reliable form of writing assessment. Determined also was the fact that deficiencies in writing skills are at their greatest when ethnicity, social economic status, and limited English language proficiency are considered. The results of the present study have suggested ways to rethink how writing is conceptualized and assessed, how past instructional practices have possibly resulted in disparities among ethnic groups, how writing skills vary with student, school, and district characteristics, and how differential writing instruction may benefit students of different ethnic groups and ELL statuses. A "one-size-fits-all" approach to writing instruction will not benefit all students in Utah or throughout the nation. Because writing differs between ethnic groups, writing instruction must differ as well.
机译:许多国家的报告表明,需要更多地关注写作和学校的写作教学。这项定量研究的目的是,首先检查DWA的结构,其次使用DWA的分数检查ELL状况与写作水平之间的关系。解决了五个主要研究问题:(1) DWA是否根据ELL身份和种族为普通学生和特定学生群体提供有效且可靠的写作水平评分? (2)2004年,2005年,2006年和2007年,犹他州公立学校的九年级学生的ELL状况与写作能力之间有什么关系,并且在多大程度上影响了学生的变量,例如性别,社会经济地位和种族,独立和累积地解释这种关系? (3)学校变量在多大程度上独立地解释了学校中低收入学生的百分比,学校中少数族裔学生的百分比,学校规模以及学校的平均ELL状况,并在一定程度上解释了ELL状况之间的关系和写作水平? (4)地区变量的程度,地区中低收入学生的百分比,地区中的少数族裔学生的百分比,地区的大小,地区的ELL平均值以及地区是独立还是累计的城市或农村解释ELL身份与写作水平之间的关系? (5)ELL地位和写作能力之间的关系在多大程度上与种族之间有相互作用?;研究结果表明DWA是一种有效而可靠的写作评估形式。还确定了以下事实:考虑到种族,社会经济地位和英语能力有限,写作技巧上的缺陷最大。本研究的结果为重新思考写作的概念和评估方法,过去的教学实践如何导致族裔之间的差异,写作技巧如何随学生,学校和地区的特点而变化以及写作差异的教学方式提出了一些建议。使不同种族和ELL身份的学生受益。一种“千篇一律”的写作教学方法不会使犹他州乃至全国的所有学生受益。由于不同种族之间的写作有所不同,因此写作指导也必须有所不同。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dunn, David E.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Utah.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Utah.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Education Evaluation.;Education Leadership.;Education Tests and Measurements.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号