首页> 外文学位 >The Politics of Protection and Extraction: A Study of the Origins and Development of State Power in Latin America.
【24h】

The Politics of Protection and Extraction: A Study of the Origins and Development of State Power in Latin America.

机译:保护与剥夺的政治:拉丁美洲国家权力的起源与发展研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Some states are strong, having centralized political power and removed violent challenges to state authority. They possess competent bureaucracies, collect taxes efficiently, and maintain steady sources of revenue. Generally speaking, these strong states uphold law and order, enforce property rights, and deliver public services to their entire population. However, other states are weak. They continue to experience violent challenges to state authority, and have difficultly collecting taxes. Possessing small, poorly equipped militaries, these weak states consistently fail to provide security and state services to many parts of the population. The primary research question that this dissertation seeks to address is: why are some states strong and others weak? What factors account for divergent patterns of state development? This dissertation examines patterns of state development in Colombia and Chile during the nineteenth and twentieth century by drawing upon original data on taxation, policing, and infrastructural development.;The central argument of this dissertation is that state building was shaped by the type and timing of conflict that each country experienced during the nineteenth century. I argue that Colombia emerged from the nineteenth century as a weak state as a result of frequent rural, regional conflict that occurred; and because of the factionalized nature of the political regime. I argue that successful Chilean state building was shaped by concerted elite responses to internal ethnic conflicts, class-based insurgencies, and international war. I also contend that initial patterns of state building were self-perpetuating. In Chile, societal elites came to rely on the services provided by an effective central government. In Colombia, the state remained absent throughout much of national territory and state services were instead usurped by local elites, who emerged in the twentieth century as a barrier to state expansion.
机译:一些州强大,拥有集中的政治权力,消除了对国家权威的暴力挑战。他们拥有主管的官僚机构,有效地征税,并保持稳定的收入来源。总体而言,这些强国维护法律和秩序,执行财产权,并向全体人民提供公共服务。但是,其他国家则薄弱。他们继续面临对国家权力机构的猛烈挑战,难以收税。这些弱小的国家拥有规模小,装备差的军队,始终无法为许多人口提供安全和国家服务。本文试图解决的主要研究问题是:为什么有些国家强而有些国家弱?哪些因素造成了国家发展模式的差异?本文利用税收,维持治安和基​​础设施发展的原始数据,考察了19世纪和20世纪哥伦比亚和智利的国家发展模式。本文的中心论点是,国家建设是由国家建设的类型和时机决定的。每个国家在19世纪经历的冲突。我认为,由于频繁发生的农村地区冲突,哥伦比亚从19世纪就成为一个弱国。并且由于政治体制的派系性质。我认为,成功的智利国家建设是由对内部种族冲突,基于阶级的叛乱和国际战争的一致精英反应所塑造的。我还认为,国家建设的最初模式是永存的。在智利,社会精英开始依靠有效的中央政府提供的服务。在哥伦比亚,整个国家的大部分地区仍然缺席该州,相反,当地精英取代了国家服务,当地精英在20世纪崛起,成为国家扩张的障碍。

著录项

  • 作者

    McDougall, Alex D.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 History Latin American.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 432 p.
  • 总页数 432
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号