首页> 外文学位 >Principles of municipal budgeting? A reexamination of the debate over the principles and proverbs of public administration.
【24h】

Principles of municipal budgeting? A reexamination of the debate over the principles and proverbs of public administration.

机译:市政预算编制的原则?重新审视关于公共行政原则和谚语的辩论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over 70 years ago a number of management principles were published that, according to their advocates, had the potential to lead to greater organizational performance and efficiency. Although generally supported, several scholars successfully argued that contradictions and ambiguity among the principles made them nearly impossible to implement in practice. As a result, they have received scant attention and applications of the concept to contemporary public administration have been limited. Nonetheless, various public management organizations recently have developed guidelines to encourage certain activities or decision rules. In particular, a comprehensive set of guidelines to define a good and accepted public budget process for state and local governments was developed in 1998. The purpose of this dissertation is to determine the degree to which local government practices correspond to these guidelines. Extensive and consistent use of the guidelines could indicate that management principles are present in certain aspects of public management. Conversely, general disregard for the guidelines could indicate disconnects between theoretical concepts and practice. Data to address this question is obtained from an original survey submitted to a random sample of municipal budget and finance officials across the United States. Two particular aspects of the framework and budget process are examined---the adoption of financial policies and the development and evaluation of financial options. A review of the survey responses indicates significant use of the guidelines among local governments. However, deviations are present across guidelines and municipalities. As a result, a number of potential explanations are explored that receive support from previous research and comments provided by respondents. Departmental leadership and municipal characteristics such as resources and population appear to explain, at least partially, the degree to which local governments utilize practices consistent with established guidelines. Overall, the study fills a research gap within public budgeting literature, supports the conclusions of previous scholarship, and illustrates the need for additional research on management guidelines, particularly those that address the budget process.
机译:70多年前,根据其倡导者的观点,发布了许多管理原则,它们有可能提高组织的绩效和效率。尽管得到了普遍支持,但一些学者成功地指出,这些原则之间的矛盾和模棱两可使得它们几乎不可能在实践中实现。结果,它们很少受到关注,并且该概念在当代公共管理中的应用受到限制。但是,各种公共管理组织最近都制定了指导方针,以鼓励某些活动或决策规则。特别是,1998年制定了一套全面的准则,为州和地方政府定义了良好的和公认的公共预算程序。本论文的目的是确定地方政府的实践在何种程度上与这些准则相对应。准则的广泛和一致使用可能表明管理原则存在于公共管理的某些方面。相反,普遍无视准则可能表明理论概念与实践之间存在脱节。用于解决该问题的数据是从原始调查中获得的,该原始调查已提交给全美市政预算和财政官员的随机样本。研究了框架和预算流程的两个特定方面-财务政策的采用以及财务方案的开发和评估。对调查答复的审查表明,地方政府之间大量使用了准则。但是,指南和市政法规之间存在偏差。结果,探索了许多可能的解释,这些解释得到了先前研究和受访者提供的评论的支持。部门领导和资源和人口等市政特征似乎至少在一定程度上解释了地方政府采用与既定准则相一致的做法的程度。总体而言,该研究填补了公共预算文献中的研究空白,支持了以前的研究成果,并说明了需要对管理指南进行更多研究,尤其是那些涉及预算过程的指南。

著录项

  • 作者

    Helpap, David J.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Public administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号