首页> 外文学位 >Performance of creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.
【24h】

Performance of creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

机译:在实体器官移植受者中基于肌酐的肾小球滤过率估计方程的性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Accurate assessment of kidney function is of critical importance for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In the general population, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is most commonly estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation. However, the accuracy of these and other GFR estimating equations in solid organ transplant recipients has not been carefully studied and there has been some hesitation among transplant physicians to use them. We performed a comprehensive review to identify all published creatinine-based eGFR equations and compared their performance to the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD Study equation in a cohort of solid organ transplant recipients, all of whom had GFR measured (mGFR) by a gold standard method. Performance was evaluated using absolute bias (mean absolute error), P30 and P20 (absolute percent error less than 30% and 20% respectively). We also assessed the influence of various subject and equation level characteristics on equation performance. A total of 26 equations were included in the systematic review and were tested in the solid organ transplant recipient cohort (n=2050, mean age 53 years, mean mGFR 55 ml/min/1.73 m 2 BSA). The CKD-EPI equation was the most accurate (P30 0.79; 99% CI 0.77, 0.81) followed by the MDRD Study equation (P 30 0.78; CI 0.75, 0.8). The CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equation performed better than or as well as the alternative equations in various categories based on subject characteristics. Equations that were developed using >1000 subjects or included race variable were more accurate than those developed on smaller cohorts or did not included race. In solid organ transplant recipients, the CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equations perform as well as or better than alternative equations. Since the CKD-EPI and the MDRD are the preferred equations in the general population, practical reasons support their use in transplant patients.
机译:肾功能的准确评估对于固体器官移植接受者的管理至关重要。在一般人群中,肾小球滤过率(GFR)最通常使用慢性肾脏病-流行病学(CKD-EPI)公式和肾脏疾病饮食的调整(MDRD)研究公式估算。然而,尚未对固体器官移植受者中这些和其他GFR估计方程的准确性进行仔细研究,并且移植医师在使用它们时存在一些犹豫。我们进行了全面的审查,确定了所有已发布的基于肌酐的eGFR方程,并将它们与CKD-EPI方程和MDRD研究方程的性能进行了比较,这些队列均由一组实心器官移植接受者进行了金测量(mGFR)标准方法。使用绝对偏差(平均绝对误差),P30和P20(绝对误差百分比分别小于30%和20%)评估性能。我们还评估了各种主题和方程式级别特征对方程式性能的影响。系统评价总共包括26个方程,并在实体器官移植接受者队列中进行了测试(n = 2050,平均年龄53岁,平均mGFR 55 ml / min / 1.73 m 2 BSA)。 CKD-EPI方程最精确(P30 0.79; 99%CI 0.77,0.81),其次是MDRD Study方程(P 30 0.78; CI 0.75,0.8)。基于主题特征,CKD-EPI和MDRD Study方程在各种类别中的表现均优于或优于替代方程。使用> 1000名受试者开发的方程或包含种族变量的方程比在较小的队列中开发的方程或不包括种族的方程更准确。在实体器官移植受者中,CKD-EPI和MDRD Study方程的性能与替代方程相同或更好。由于CKD-EPI和MDRD是一般人群的首选方程式,因此实际原因支持它们在移植患者中的使用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shaffi, Saeed Kamran.;

  • 作者单位

    Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences (Tufts University).;

  • 授予单位 Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences (Tufts University).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Medicine and Surgery.;Health Sciences Surgery.;Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 54 p.
  • 总页数 54
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号