首页> 外文学位 >From Grail procession to 'cortege infernal': Processions in classical poetry and Renaissance and nineteenth-century French literature as poetic vision and structure of critical thought.
【24h】

From Grail procession to 'cortege infernal': Processions in classical poetry and Renaissance and nineteenth-century French literature as poetic vision and structure of critical thought.

机译:从圣杯游行到“苦行僧”:古典诗歌和文艺复兴时期以及十九世纪法国文学中的游行作为诗歌视野和批判思想的结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Critics have failed to read processions in literature, while using them as a privileged metaphor; yet poets and novelists have depicted processions unstintingly in ways that illuminate poetic imitation, genre, and the development from epic to lyric. In particular, in post-Christian literature, writers have depicted scenes where characters themselves must interpret processions, beginning with Perceval and the Grail procession. Sociological and anthropological analyses of processions, based on the work of thinkers such as Clifford Geertz and Victor Turner, offer limited potential to explain processions in literature. As an example of critics' ambivalence toward processions in literature, Auerbach's Mimesis narrative of literary history demonstrates a failure to read the processions in the literary texts he chooses, as well as an opposition between two processional forms that he never acknowledges: the hierarchical and the purely serial, which he uses as metaphors for literature's capacity to represent history and achieve realism. These omissions and undeclared dichotomies, in turn, show Auerbach to be a forerunner of the New Historicism and cultural theory, sharing with them an unacknowledged inheritance from Neo-Kantian philosophy and Hegel. Since Auerbach's misreading of processions is partly a function of his misunderstanding of classical literature, I go on to analyze how classical epic catalogues, representations of processions, have been misunderstood since the Renaissance. This counters a view of ancient Roman poetry and imitation established in the Renaissance that persists in scholarship today, even though philology has given twentieth-century classicists a new understanding of Vergil, Horace and Ovid and their relation to Callimachus and Hellenistic poetry. Using this new scholarship, a reading of Ronsard's epic catalogue in the Franciade shows how Ronsard misread classical poetry as a Renaissance reader, but responded to it as a poet. Victor Hugo's Notre-Dame de Paris is as full of processions as it is suffused by the ego of the writer. Hugo seems to impose a sociological interpretation of these processions, but an alternative reading of the novel shows that it prefigures more successful lyric works. In another example of the failure to read, Walter Benjamin's influential readings of Baudelaire miss its processions. Correcting this, I argue that Baudelaire deepens the processional depictions of the self begun by Vergil and Ronsard, and relates them to the society around him.
机译:批评家在将游行队伍用作特权隐喻时未能阅读文学作品。然而,诗人和小说家毫不客气地描绘了游行,以阐明诗的模仿,体裁以及从史诗到抒情诗的发展。尤其是在后基督教文学中,作家们描绘了人物自身必须解释游行队伍的场景,这些场面从Perceval和Grail游行队伍开始。对游行的社会学和人类学分析,基于克利福德·盖尔茨(Clifford Geertz)和维克多·特纳(Victor Turner)等思想家的工作,为解释文学中的游行提供了有限的潜力。作为评论家对文学游行的歧义的一个例子,奥尔巴赫的《模仿史》对文学史的叙述表明,他无法阅读他所选择的文学文本中的游行,以及他从未承认的两种游行形式之间的对立:等级制和形式主义。纯粹是连续的,他被用作隐喻文学代表历史和实现现实主义的能力。这些疏漏和二分法反过来表明,奥尔巴赫是新历史主义和文化理论的先驱,并与他们分享了新康德哲学和黑格尔的未经承认的继承。由于奥尔巴赫对游行的误读部分是由于他对古典文学的误解造成的,所以我继续分析自文艺复兴以来如何对古典史诗目录,游行代表进行了误解。这与文艺复兴时期确立的古罗马诗歌和模仿观点相违背,这种观点一直沿用至今,尽管今天的语言学使二十世纪的古典主义者对维吉尔,贺拉斯和奥维德有了新的理解,以及他们与卡利马丘斯和希腊化诗歌的关系。使用这项新的奖学金,朗萨德对《法兰西岛》史诗目录的阅读显示了朗萨德是如何以文艺复兴时期的读者误读古典诗歌的,但是却以诗人的身份回应。维克多·雨果(Victor Hugo)的巴黎圣母院(Notre-Dame de Paris)充满了作家的自我意识,充满了游行队伍。雨果似乎强加了对这些游行的社会学解释,但是对小说的另一种解读表明,它预示着更成功的抒情作品。在另一个未能阅读的例子中,沃尔特·本杰明(Walter Benjamin)对波德莱尔(Baudelaire)的有影响力的解读错过了游行队伍。更正这一点,我认为波德莱尔深化了维吉尔和罗纳德所开始的自我的过程描述,并将其与他周围的社会联系起来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lydon, Katherine M.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;Literature Romance.;Literature Comparative.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 239 p.
  • 总页数 239
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号