首页> 外文学位 >Analysis of the implementation of a special education consultative co-teaching model in Iowa high schools.
【24h】

Analysis of the implementation of a special education consultative co-teaching model in Iowa high schools.

机译:分析爱荷华州高中特殊教育咨询式联合教学模式的实施情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mandates of the 2001 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and 2004 reauthorization of IDEA have accelerated the movement toward inclusion making it imperative that students with disabilities have access to the general education curriculum taught by highly qualified teachers to the maximum extent possible (Friend, 2006). The Iowa Department of Education introduced the consultative (co-teaching) model (2006) as one means for fulfilling the NCLB requirement that all students be taught by highly qualified teachers. This study examined the level of implementation of the components Iowa Department of Education's consultative (co-teaching) model by Iowa high schools and the teacher and administrative factors influencing this implementation. Student achievement levels among high and low implementing schools were analyzed to determine the effect of the implementation of the consultative (co-teaching) model on the high schools' ability to meet performance targets.;A survey instrument was used to collect quantitative data. Written comments from survey participants and focus group interviews with special and general education coteachers provided qualitative data. The study consisted of a sample population of 100 randomly and purposively selected high schools of which 55 participated representing 15% of Iowa high schools. A total of 242 special and general education co-teachers completed the survey. Three high schools were purposively selected for focus group interviews from survey participants.;Quantitative results indicated and qualitative data supported (to a lesser extent) that Iowa high schools were implementing four of the five components of the co-teaching model these included: philosophy, individual prerequisites, professional relationships, and classroom dynamics. The fifth component, external supports, was the least implemented component. Separate Pearson's coefficient alpha correlation tests found teacher and administrative factors were significantly correlated with the implementation of the co-teaching model.;Separate independent t tests were applied to 2006-07 and 2007-08 ITED achievement data. Results indicated no significant effect of the implementation of the coteaching model on reading comprehension and math student achievement of 11th grade students with disabilities between high and low implementing high schools. Sample size and early implementation may have limited the power to detect statistical significance.;The significance of the study will assist local, state, and national educational leaders as they lead the implementation of inclusive practices and strive to meet state and federal performance goals. Results will assist the Iowa Department of Education and Great Prairie AEA in planning for statewide and area professional development to support co-teachers.
机译:2001年不让任何孩子落后(NCLB)和2004年IDEA重新授权的要求加速了向包容性发展的进程,这使得当务之急是,残疾学生必须最大程度地使用由高素质老师教的通识教育课程(Friend,2006年) )。爱荷华州教育部引入了咨询(共同教学)模式(2006年),作为满足NCLB要求所有学生都由高素质教师教的一种方式。这项研究检查了爱荷华州中学对爱荷华州教育部的咨询(共同教学)模型的组成部分的实施水平,以及影响该实施的教师和行政因素。分析了高中和低实施学校的学生成就水平,以确定实施咨询(共同教学)模式对高中达到绩效目标的能力的影响。;使用调查工具收集定量数据。调查参与者的书面评论以及与特殊和普通教育的小学生进行的焦点小组访谈提供了定性数据。该研究由100名随机和有目的选择的高中样本人群组成,其中55所参加,占爱荷华州高中的15%。共有242名特殊和普通教育共同老师完成了调查。目的是从调查参与者中选出三所高中作为焦点小组访谈。;定量结果表明和定性数据(在较小程度上)支持爱荷华州高中正在实施联合教学模型的五个组成部分中的四个,包括:哲学,个人先决条件,专业关系和课堂动态。第五部分是外部支持,是实施最少的部分。单独的Pearson系数α相关检验发现教师和行政因素与共同教学模型的实施显着相关。;对2006-07年和2007-08年ITED成绩数据分别进行了独立的t检验。结果表明,实施改编模型对高中和低中实施中学之间的11年级残疾学生的阅读理解和数学学生成绩没有显着影响。样本量和早期实施可能会限制检测统计显着性的能力。该研究的重要性将帮助地方,州和国家教育领导者领导包容性做法的实施,并努力实现州和联邦绩效目标。结果将帮助爱荷华州教育部和大草原地区AEA计划在全州和地区进行专业发展,以支持联合教师。

著录项

  • 作者

    Anderson, Lonna Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    Western Illinois University.;

  • 授予单位 Western Illinois University.;
  • 学科 Education Special.;Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 203 p.
  • 总页数 203
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 特殊教育;中等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号