【24h】

A Critical Issue of Making Out Loading Port Unloading Port in the Bill of Lading for Marine Transportation

机译:海运提单中明确装卸港的关键问题

获取原文

摘要

Making out bill of lading is very important to the exporter, the Freight Forwarder and the Third Party Logistics in marine transportation. However, there are many queries on how to make out loading port and unloading port in bill of lading. Those most commonly disputed problems in bill of lading have made many unwarranted rejections in marine transportation. This study tried to explain how those practices articulated in the UCP600 and the ISBP are to be applied and propose the appropriated way to make out loading port and unloading port. Through the studies on cases and by means of comparison etc., the ISBP and the UCP600 were discussed in detail under the present work, in which laws on negotiable instruments, maritime laws, international business customs and practices were applied. When the bill of lading includes the place of receipt different from the port of loading or the final destination different from the port of discharge, the first query is how to divide and bear the cost and responsibility of the transportation from the place of receipt to the port of loading or from the port of discharge to the final destination. The other query is that whether the place of receipt or the final destination in the bill of lading must be a port or not. Case study and comparative analysis between international custom and ICC decisions show that both parties of the contract should make in agreement in the letter of credit on how to divide and bear the cost and responsibility of the marine transportation. Meanwhile, the related international customs should make it perfect and clarified. In addition, the place of receipt or the final destination in the bill of lading should be a port. However, the place of receipt or the final destination can also be an inland site when the Letter of Credit has stipulated it.
机译:在海运中,签发提单对出口商,货运代理和第三方物流非常重要。但是,关于如何在提单中确定装货港和卸货港有很多疑问。那些在提单中最常引起争议的问题在海运中遭到了许多不必要的拒绝。本研究试图解释如何应用UCP600和ISBP中阐明的那些做法,并提出确定装货港和卸货港的适当方法。通过对案例的研究和比较等方法,在当前工作中对ISBP和UCP600进行了详细讨论,其中适用了流通票据法,海商法,国际商务惯例和惯例。当提单包含不同于装货港的收货地或不同于卸货港的最终目的地时,第一个查询是如何划分和承担从收货地到货物的运输成本和责任装货港或从卸货港到最终目的地。另一个疑问是提货单上的收货地或最终目的地必须是港口。案例研究和国际惯例与ICC决定之间的比较分析表明,合同双方应在信用证中就如何分担和承担海上运输的成本和责任达成协议。同时,有关国际惯例应使其完善和明确。另外,提货单上的收货地或最终目的地应为港口。但是,在信用证规定的地方,收货地或最终目的地也可以是内陆地点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号