首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >The Precision and Accuracy of Urinary Creatinine Analysis for Correction of Urine Dilution in Biological Monitoring Measurements
【24h】

The Precision and Accuracy of Urinary Creatinine Analysis for Correction of Urine Dilution in Biological Monitoring Measurements

机译:尿肌酐分析校正生物监测测量中尿液稀释的精度和准确性

获取原文

摘要

Biomonitoring has been widely used to assess environmental exposure, and spot urine is commonly studied due to its easy sample collection. The variability of urine dilution has been crucial for assessing the exposure magnitude. Previous studies indicated that creatinine-adjusted concentrations are better correlated with the parent chemical concentrations in blood, plasma or serum than unadjusted concentrations. More recent studies have documented problems with creatinine-adjustment in pregnant women and diverse populations because creatinine varies with age, gender, race, body size, and diet. In addition to the inter- and intra-person variability in creatinine, we found significant variability in the testing methods and the testing laboratories. Two immunoassays gave decidedly different concentrations on the same samples in two different laboratories and even had a greater than 35% bias on NIST Standard Reference Materials. In an attempt to standardize the creatinine measurements, both laboratories adopted the same immunoassay. The inter-laboratory relative percent differences (RPD) ranged from 0.3-13.4% with 5.2% median, and the values determined in each laboratory were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient: r=0.98). Although the results were correlated and relatively precise, 15% biases were found between laboratories with values determined by laboratory B being uniformly higher. The directional significant differences were confirmed by paired t-test (p-value<0.001). Thus, a systemic error can occur among different laboratories which might alter the point estimates of central tendency and percentile concentrations. The results show that in addition to the inherent limitations of biological variation in using creatinine-adjustment in biomonitoring, laboratory error from non-standardized measurements can further introduce variation. Taken together, we suggest that the standardized creatinine measurement or cross-laboratories validation is needed.
机译:生物监测已被广泛用于评估环境暴露,并且由于其易于样本收集,通常研究现货尿液。尿液稀释的可变性对于评估曝光幅度至关重要。以前的研究表明,肌酸酐调节的浓度与血液,血浆或血清中的母体化学浓度更好地相关,而不是不调整的浓度。最近的研究记录了孕妇和不同种群的肌酐调整问题,因为肌酐随着年龄,性别,种族,体型和饮食而异。除了肌酐中的互相变异性外,我们还发现了测试方法和测试实验室的显着变化。两个免疫测定在两种不同的实验室中的相同样品中产生了明显不同的浓度,甚至在NIST标准参考材料上具有大于35%的偏差。试图标准化肌酸酐测量,两个实验室都采用了相同的免疫测定。实验室相对百分比差异(RPD)的差异为0.3-13.4%,中值5.2%,每个实验室测定的值高度相关(Pearson相关系数:r = 0.98)。虽然结果是相关的,并且相对精确,但在实验室B测定的实验室之间发现了15%的偏差均匀。通过配对T检验确认定向显着差异(p值<0.001)。因此,在不同的实验室中可能发生系统误差,这可能改变中央趋势和百分位浓度的点估计。结果表明,除了在生物监测中使用肌酐调节的生物变异的固有局限性之外,非标准化测量的实验室误差还可以进一步引入变化。一起携带,我们建议需要标准化的肌酐测量或跨实验室验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号